Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Sampling (statistics)
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Errors in sample surveys== {{main|Sampling error}} Survey results are typically subject to some error. Total errors can be classified into sampling errors and non-sampling errors. The term "error" here includes systematic biases as well as random errors. ===Sampling errors and biases=== Sampling errors and biases are induced by the sample design. They include: # [[Selection bias]]: When the true selection probabilities differ from those assumed in calculating the results. # [[Sampling error|Random sampling error]]: Random variation in the results due to the elements in the sample being selected at random. ===Non-sampling error=== {{main|Non-sampling error}} Non-sampling errors are other errors which can impact final survey estimates, caused by problems in data collection, processing, or sample design. Such errors may include: # Over-coverage: inclusion of data from outside of the population # Under-coverage: sampling frame does not include elements in the population. # Measurement error: e.g. when respondents misunderstand a question, or find it difficult to answer # Processing error: mistakes in data coding # [[Participation bias|Non-response or Participation bias]]: failure to obtain complete data from all selected individuals After sampling, a review is held of the exact process followed in sampling, rather than that intended, in order to study any effects that any divergences might have on subsequent analysis. A particular problem involves ''non-response''. Two major types of non-response exist:<ref>Berinsky, A. J. (2008). "Survey non-response". In: W. Donsbach & M. W. Traugott (Eds.), ''The Sage handbook of public opinion research'' (pp. 309β321). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.</ref><ref name="Dillman et al 2002">Dillman, D. A., Eltinge, J. L., Groves, R. M., & Little, R. J. A. (2002). "Survey nonresponse in design, data collection, and analysis". In: R. M. Groves, D. A. Dillman, J. L. Eltinge, & R. J. A. Little (Eds.), ''Survey nonresponse'' (pp. 3β26). New York: John Wiley & Sons.</ref> * unit nonresponse (lack of completion of any part of the survey) * item non-response (submission or participation in survey but failing to complete one or more components/questions of the survey) In [[survey sampling]], many of the individuals identified as part of the sample may be unwilling to participate, not have the time to participate ([[opportunity cost]]),<ref>Dillman, D.A., Smyth, J.D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.</ref> or survey administrators may not have been able to contact them. In this case, there is a risk of differences between respondents and nonrespondents, leading to biased estimates of population parameters. This is often addressed by improving survey design, offering incentives, and conducting follow-up studies which make a repeated attempt to contact the unresponsive and to characterize their similarities and differences with the rest of the frame.<ref>Vehovar, V., Batagelj, Z., Manfreda, K.L., & Zaletel, M. (2002). "Nonresponse in web surveys". In: R. M. Groves, D. A. Dillman, J. L. Eltinge, & R. J. A. Little (Eds.), ''Survey nonresponse'' (pp. 229β242). New York: John Wiley & Sons.</ref> The effects can also be mitigated by weighting the data (when population benchmarks are available) or by imputing data based on answers to other questions. Nonresponse is particularly a problem in internet sampling. Reasons for this problem may include improperly designed surveys,<ref name="Dillman et al 2002"/> over-surveying (or survey fatigue),<ref name="SM"/><ref> {{cite book | last1 = Porter | last2 = Whitcomb | last3 = Weitzer | chapter = Multiple surveys of students and survey fatigue | editor1-last = Porter | editor1-first = Stephen R | title = Overcoming survey research problems | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=9TadAAAAMAAJ | series = New directions for institutional research | issue = 121 | location = San Francisco | publisher = Jossey-Bass | date = 2004 | pages = 63β74 | isbn = 9780787974770 | access-date = 15 July 2019 }} </ref>{{request quotation|date=July 2019}} and the fact that potential participants may have multiple e-mail addresses, which they do not use anymore or do not check regularly.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)