Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Free software movement
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Economics== The free software movement has been extensively analyzed using economic methodologies, including perspectives from [[heterodox economics]]. Of particular interest to economists{{Who|date=June 2021}} is the willingness of programmers in the free software movement to work, {{citation needed span|date=June 2021|often producing higher-quality than proprietary programmers, without financial compensation}}.<!-- Free software can be commercial --> In his 1998 article "The High-Tech Gift Economy", [[Richard Barbrook]] suggested that the then-nascent free software movement represented a return to the [[gift economy]] building on [[hobby]]ism and the [[Post-scarcity economy|absence of economic scarcity]] on the Internet.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Barbrook |first1=Richard |date=1998 |title=The High-Tech Gift Economy |url=http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/631/552 |journal=First Monday |volume=13 |issue=12 |access-date=July 22, 2018 |archive-date=July 22, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180722184805/http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/631/552 |url-status=live }}</ref> [[Gabriella Coleman]] has emphasized the importance of accreditation, respect, and [[honour]] within the free software community as a form of compensation for contributions to projects, over and against financial motivations.<ref>Coleman (2013), p. 116-7.</ref> The Swedish [[Marxian economics|Marxian]] economist Johan Söderberg has argued that the free software movement represents a complete alternative to [[capitalism]] that may be expanded to create a post-work society. He argues that the combination of a manipulation of intellectual property law<!-- The term "intellectual property" groups together multiple unrelated laws. Which one is being referred to here? --> and [[private property]] to make goods available to the public and a thorough blend between labor and fun make the free software movement a [[communism|communist economy]].<ref>Söderberg (2007), p. 153-4.</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)