Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Animal testing
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Threats to researchers=== Threats of violence to animal researchers are not uncommon.{{Vague|date=November 2019}}<ref name=naturebiotech>{{cite journal | author = Huggett B | title = When animal rights turns ugly | journal = Nature Biotechnology | volume = 26 | issue = 6 | pages = 603–05 | year = 2008 | pmid = 18536673 | doi = 10.1038/nbt0608-603 | s2cid = 8006958 }}</ref> In 2006, a primate researcher at the [[University of California, Los Angeles]] (UCLA) shut down the experiments in his lab after threats from animal rights activists. The researcher had received a grant to use 30 [[macaque]] monkeys for vision experiments; each monkey was anesthetized for a single physiological experiment lasting up to 120 hours, and then euthanized.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Malone BJ, Kumar VR, Ringach DL | title = Dynamics of Receptive Field Size in Primary Visual Cortex | journal = Journal of Neurophysiology | volume = 97 | issue = 1 | pages = 407–14 | year = 2007 | pmid = 17021020 | doi = 10.1152/jn.00830.2006 | citeseerx = 10.1.1.133.3969 }}</ref> The researcher's name, phone number, and address were posted on the website of the [[Primate Freedom Project]]. Demonstrations were held in front of his home. A [[Molotov cocktail]] was placed on the porch of what was believed to be the home of another UCLA primate researcher; instead, it was accidentally left on the porch of an elderly woman unrelated to the university. The [[Animal Liberation Front]] claimed responsibility for the attack.<ref>Epstein, David (22 August 2006). [http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/08/22/animal Throwing in the Towel] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201127012451/https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/08/22/animal |date=27 November 2020 }}, ''Inside Higher Education''</ref> As a result of the campaign, the researcher sent an email to the Primate Freedom Project stating "you win", and "please don't bother my family anymore".<ref>{{usurped|1=[https://web.archive.org/web/20080517050122/http://www.investors.com/editorial/editorialcontent.asp?secid=1501&status=article&id=241311597601024 Predators Unleashed]}}, ''Investor's Business Daily'' (2006-08-24)</ref> In another incident at UCLA in June 2007, the [[Revolutionary Cells (RCALB)|Animal Liberation Brigade]] placed a bomb under the car of a UCLA children's [[ophthalmologist]] who [[Animal testing on cats|experiments on cats]] and rhesus monkeys; the bomb had a faulty fuse and did not detonate.<ref>McDonald, Patrick Range (8 August 2007). {{usurped|1=[https://web.archive.org/web/20080215232132/http://www.laweekly.com/news/news/monkey-madness-at-ucla/16986/ UCLA Monkey Madness]}}, ''LA Weekly''.</ref> In 1997, PETA filmed staff from [[Huntingdon Life Sciences]], showing dogs being mistreated.<ref>"It's a Dog's Life", ''Countryside Undercover'', Channel Four Television, UK (26 March 1997).</ref><ref>[http://www.smallworldtv.co.uk/public/main.cfm?m1=c_75&m2=c_2&m3=c_54&m4=e_0 "It's a dog's life"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120308224555/http://www.smallworldtv.co.uk/public/main.cfm?m1=c_75&m2=c_2&m3=c_54&m4=e_0 |date=8 March 2012 }}, Small World Productions (2005). Retrieved 6 July 2010.</ref> The employees responsible were dismissed,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/1123837.stm |title=A controversial laboratory |work=BBC News |date=18 January 2001 |access-date=2012-07-13}}</ref> with two given community service orders and ordered to pay £250 costs, the first lab technicians to have been prosecuted for animal cruelty in the UK.<ref>Broughton, Zoe (March 2001). {{usurped|1=[https://archive.today/20120629060332/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2465/is_2_31/ai_71634854/ "Seeing Is Believing – cruelty to dogs at Huntingdon Life Sciences"]}}, ''The Ecologist''.</ref> The [[Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty]] campaign used tactics ranging from non-violent protest to the alleged firebombing of houses owned by executives associated with HLS's clients and investors. The [[Southern Poverty Law Center]], which monitors US domestic extremism, has described SHAC's ''modus operandi'' as "frankly terroristic tactics similar to those of anti-abortion extremists", and in 2005 an official with the FBI's counter-terrorism division referred to SHAC's activities in the United States as domestic terrorist threats.<ref>[http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=42 "From push to shove"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091122190431/http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=42 |date=22 November 2009 }}, Southern Poverty Law Group ''Intelligence Report'', Fall 2002</ref><ref>Lewis, John E. {{usurped|1=[https://web.archive.org/web/20080801014736/http://epw.senate.gov/hearing_statements.cfm?id=247787 "Statement of John Lewis"]}}, US Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, 26 October 2005, accessed 17 January 2011.</ref> 13 members of SHAC were jailed for between 15 months and eleven years on charges of conspiracy to blackmail or harm HLS and its suppliers.<ref name="Evers">Evers, Marco. [http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,517875,00.html "Resisting the Animal Avengers", Part 1], [http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,517875-2,00.html Part 2], ''Der Spiegel'', 19 November 2007.</ref><ref name="Weaver">Weaver, Matthew. [https://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/oct/25/animal-research-animal-welfare "Animal rights activists jailed for terrorising suppliers to Huntingdon Life Sciences"], ''The Guardian'', 25 October 2010.</ref> These attacks—as well as similar incidents that caused the [[Southern Poverty Law Center]] to declare in 2002 that the animal rights movement had "clearly taken a turn toward the more extreme"—prompted the US government to pass the [[Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act]] and the UK government to add the offense of "Intimidation of persons connected with animal research organisation" to the [[Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005]]. Such legislation and the arrest and imprisonment of activists may have decreased the incidence of attacks.<ref>Herbert, Ian (27 January 2007). [https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/collapse-in-support-for-animal-rights-extremist-attacks-433872.html "Collapse in support for animal rights extremist attacks"], ''The Independent''.</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)