Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Collatz conjecture
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==In computational complexity== Collatz and related conjectures are often used when studying computational complexity.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Michel, Pascal |title=Busy beaver competition and Collatz-like problems |journal=Archive for Mathematical Logic |volume=32 |issue=5 |year=1993 |pages=351β367|doi=10.1007/BF01409968 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://arxiv.org/html/2107.12475v2 |title=Hardness of busy beaver value BB(15)}}</ref> The connection is made through the [[busy beaver]] function, where BB(n) is the maximum number of steps taken by any n state [[Turing machine]] that halts. There is a 15 state Turing machine that halts if and only if a conjecture by [[Paul ErdΕs]] (closely related to the Collatz conjecture) is false. Hence if BB(15) was known, and this machine did not stop in that number of steps, it would be known to run forever and hence no counterexamples exist (which proves the conjecture true). This is a completely impractical way to settle the conjecture; instead it is used to suggest that BB(15) will be very hard to compute, at least as difficult as settling this Collatz-like conjecture.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)