Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Limit of a function
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Other characterizations == === In terms of sequences === For functions on the real line, one way to define the limit of a function is in terms of the limit of sequences. (This definition is usually attributed to [[Eduard Heine]].) In this setting: <math display=block>\lim_{x\to a}f(x)=L</math> if, and only if, for all sequences {{mvar|x{{sub|n}}}} (with, for all {{mvar|n}}, {{mvar|x{{sub|n}}}} not equal to {{mvar|a}}) converging to {{mvar|a}} the sequence {{math|''f''(''x{{sub|n}}'')}} converges to {{mvar|L}}. It was shown by [[Sierpiński]] in 1916 that proving the equivalence of this definition and the definition above, requires and is equivalent to a weak form of the [[axiom of choice]]. Note that defining what it means for a sequence {{mvar|x{{sub|n}}}} to converge to {{mvar|a}} requires the [[epsilon, delta method]]. Similarly as it was the case of Weierstrass's definition, a more general Heine definition applies to functions defined on [[subset]]s of the real line. Let {{mvar|f}} be a real-valued function with the domain {{math|''Dm''(''f'' )}}. Let {{mvar|a}} be the limit of a sequence of elements of {{math|''Dm''(''f'' ) \ {''a''}.}} Then the limit (in this sense) of {{mvar|f}} is {{mvar|L}} as {{mvar|x}} approaches {{mvar|a}} if for every sequence {{math|''x{{sub|n}}'' ∈ ''Dm''(''f'' ) \ {''a''} }} (so that for all {{mvar|n}}, {{mvar|x{{sub|n}}}} is not equal to {{mvar|a}}) that converges to {{mvar|a}}, the sequence {{math|''f''(''x{{sub|n}}'')}} converges to {{mvar|L}}. This is the same as the definition of a sequential limit in the preceding section obtained by regarding the subset {{math|''Dm''(''f'' )}} of {{tmath|\R}} as a metric space with the induced metric. ===In non-standard calculus=== In non-standard calculus the limit of a function is defined by: <math display=block>\lim_{x\to a}f(x)=L</math> if and only if for all <math>x\in \R^*,</math> <math>f^*(x)-L</math> is infinitesimal whenever {{math|''x'' − ''a''}} is infinitesimal. Here <math>\R^*</math> are the [[hyperreal number]]s and {{mvar|f*}} is the natural extension of {{mvar|f}} to the non-standard real numbers. [[Howard Jerome Keisler|Keisler]] proved that such a hyperreal [[Non-standard calculus#Limit|definition of limit]] reduces the quantifier complexity by two quantifiers.<ref>{{citation|last1=Keisler|first1=H. Jerome|chapter=Quantifiers in limits|title=Andrzej Mostowski and foundational studies|pages=151–170|publisher=IOS, Amsterdam|year=2008|contribution-url=http://www.math.wisc.edu/~keisler/limquant7.pdf}}</ref> On the other hand, Hrbacek writes that for the definitions to be valid for all hyperreal numbers they must implicitly be grounded in the ε-δ method, and claims that, from the pedagogical point of view, the hope that non-standard calculus could be done without ε-δ methods cannot be realized in full.<ref>{{citation|last1=Hrbacek|first1=K.|editor1-first=I.|editor2-last=Neves|editor2-first=V.| chapter=Stratified Analysis?|title=The Strength of Nonstandard Analysis|publisher=Springer|year=2007|editor-last=Van Den Berg}}</ref> Bŀaszczyk et al. detail the usefulness of [[microcontinuity]] in developing a transparent definition of uniform continuity, and characterize Hrbacek's criticism as a "dubious lament".<ref>{{citation | last1 = Bŀaszczyk | first1 = Piotr | last2 = Katz | first2 = Mikhail | author2-link = Mikhail Katz | last3 = Sherry | first3 = David | year = 2012 | title = Ten misconceptions from the history of analysis and their debunking | journal = [[Foundations of Science]] | arxiv = 1202.4153 | doi = 10.1007/s10699-012-9285-8 | volume = 18 | issue = 1 | pages = 43–74 | s2cid = 119134151 }}</ref> === In terms of nearness === At the 1908 international congress of mathematics [[Frigyes Riesz|F. Riesz]] introduced an alternate way defining limits and continuity in concept called "nearness".<ref>{{citation|contribution=Stetigkeitsbegriff und abstrakte Mengenlehre (The Concept of Continuity and Abstract Set Theory)|author=F. Riesz|date=7 April 1908|title=[[International Congress of Mathematicians|1908 International Congress of Mathematicians]]}}</ref> A point {{mvar|x}} is defined to be near a set <math>A\subseteq \R</math> if for every {{math|''r'' > 0}} there is a point {{math|''a'' ∈ ''A''}} so that {{math|{{abs|''x'' − ''a''}} < ''r''}}. In this setting the <math display=block>\lim_{x\to a} f(x)=L</math> if and only if for all <math>A\subseteq \R,</math> {{mvar|L}} is near {{math|''f''(''A'')}} whenever {{mvar|a}} is near {{mvar|A}}. Here {{math|''f''(''A'')}} is the set <math>\{f(x) | x \in A\}.</math> This definition can also be extended to metric and topological spaces.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)