Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Agile software development
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Values === The agile manifesto reads:<ref name="AgileManifesto" /> ''We are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it and helping others do it. Through this work we have come to value:'' * {{em | {{strong | Individuals and interactions}} over processes and tools }} * {{em | {{strong | Working software}} over comprehensive documentation }} * {{em | {{strong | Customer collaboration}} over contract negotiation }} * {{em | {{strong | Responding to change}} over following a plan }} ''That is, while there is value in the items on the right, we value the items on the left more.'' [[Scott Ambler]] explained:<ref name="abmmw"> {{cite web |url=http://www.ambysoft.com/essays/agileManifesto.html |title=Examining the Agile Manifesto |publisher=Ambysoft Inc. |access-date=6 April 2011}}</ref> * Tools and processes are important, but it is more important to have competent people working together effectively. *Good documentation is useful in helping people to understand how the software is built and how to use it, but the main point of development is to create software, not documentation. *A contract is important but is not a substitute for working closely with customers to discover what they need. *A project plan is important, but it must not be too rigid to accommodate changes in technology or the environment, stakeholders' priorities, and people's understanding of the problem and its solution. Introducing the manifesto on behalf of the Agile Alliance, [[Jim Highsmith]] said, {{Blockquote |text=The Agile movement is not anti-methodology, in fact many of us want to restore credibility to the word methodology. We want to restore a balance. We embrace modeling, but not in order to file some diagram in a dusty corporate repository. We embrace documentation, but not hundreds of pages of never-maintained and rarely-used tomes. We plan, but recognize the limits of planning in a turbulent environment. Those who would brand proponents of XP or SCRUM or any of the other Agile Methodologies as "hackers" are ignorant of both the methodologies and the original definition of the term hacker.|sign=Jim Highsmith |author=Jim Highsmith |source=History: The Agile Manifesto<ref> {{cite web | url=http://agilemanifesto.org/history.html | title=History: The Agile Manifesto |year=2001 |author=Jim Highsmith |author-link=Jim Highsmith |publisher=agilemanifesto.org}} </ref>}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)