Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Argument principle
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Proof of the argument principle== Let ''z''<sub>''Z''</sub> be a zero of ''f''. We can write ''f''(''z'') = (''z'' − ''z''<sub>''Z''</sub>)<sup>''k''</sup>''g''(''z'') where ''k'' is the multiplicity of the zero, and thus ''g''(''z''<sub>''Z''</sub>) β 0. We get : <math>f'(z)=k(z-z_Z)^{k-1}g(z)+(z-z_Z)^kg'(z)\,\!</math> and : <math>{f'(z)\over f(z)}={k \over z-z_Z}+{g'(z)\over g(z)}.</math> Since ''g''(''z''<sub>''Z''</sub>) β 0, it follows that ''g' ''(''z'')/''g''(''z'') has no singularities at ''z''<sub>''Z''</sub>, and thus is analytic at ''z''<sub>Z</sub>, which implies that the [[Residue (complex analysis)|residue]] of ''f''′(''z'')/''f''(''z'') at ''z''<sub>''Z''</sub> is ''k''. Let ''z''<sub>P</sub> be a pole of ''f''. We can write ''f''(''z'') = (''z'' − ''z''<sub>P</sub>)<sup>−''m''</sup>''h''(''z'') where ''m'' is the order of the pole, and ''h''(''z''<sub>P</sub>) β 0. Then, : <math>f'(z)=-m(z-z_P)^{-m-1}h(z)+(z-z_P)^{-m}h'(z)\,\!.</math> and : <math>{f'(z)\over f(z)}={-m \over z-z_P}+{h'(z)\over h(z)}</math> similarly as above. It follows that ''h''′(''z'')/''h''(''z'') has no singularities at ''z''<sub>P</sub> since ''h''(''z''<sub>P</sub>) β 0 and thus it is analytic at ''z''<sub>P</sub>. We find that the residue of ''f''′(''z'')/''f''(''z'') at ''z''<sub>P</sub> is −''m''. Putting these together, each zero ''z''<sub>''Z''</sub> of multiplicity ''k'' of ''f'' creates a simple pole for ''f''′(''z'')/''f''(''z'') with the residue being ''k'', and each pole ''z''<sub>P</sub> of order ''m'' of ''f'' creates a simple pole for ''f''′(''z'')/''f''(''z'') with the residue being −''m''. (Here, by a simple pole we mean a pole of order one.) In addition, it can be shown that ''f''′(''z'')/''f''(''z'') has no other poles, and so no other residues. By the [[residue theorem]] we have that the integral about ''C'' is the product of 2''Οi'' and the sum of the residues. Together, the sum of the ''k''{{'}}s for each zero ''z''<sub>''Z''</sub> is the number of zeros counting multiplicities of the zeros, and likewise for the poles, and so we have our result.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)