Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Attempt
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== United States === The legal rules for establishing the ''actus reus'' of an attempt offense in the United States are varied and nonuniform. Generally, there are two categories which a test can fall under: tests that focus on how much remains to be done before the crime is committed; and those that consider what has already occurred.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|last=Dressler|first=Joshua|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1080075738|title=Criminal Law: Cases and Materials|date=2019|others=Stephen P. Garvey|isbn=978-1-68328-822-0|edition=8|location=St. Paul, MN|pages=323β334|oclc=1080075738}}</ref> Further complicating matters, U.S. jurisdictions rarely use only one test.<ref name=":0" /> ====New York State==== In [[New York (state)|New York]] law, the element of ''actus reus'' is that the person engages in conduct that "tends to effect the commission of such crime".<ref>[[N.Y. Penal Law]] section 110.00, which may be found at [http://www.assembly.state.ny.us New York State Assembly web site].</ref> The test this requires ''either'': * An action that reveals a [[intent (law)|criminal intent]], that is, '''''[[res ipsa loquitur]]''''', or "the thing speaks for itself", ''or'' * The person has '''[[Dangerous proximity doctrine|dangerous proximity]]''', or is "dangerously near and close to the accomplishment of the crime".<ref>''People v. Acosta'' (N.Y. Court of Appeals 1993).</ref> The dangerous proximity test was formulated by Justice [[Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.|Oliver Wendell Holmes]] in the trial of [[Commonwealth v. Peaslee|''Commonwealth'' [of Massachusetts] ''v. Peaslee'']] in 1901.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Commonwealth v. Peaslee {{!}} Case Brief for Law School {{!}} LexisNexis|url=https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/casebrief/p/casebrief-commonwealth-v-peaslee|access-date=2021-11-18|website=LexisNexis|language=en}}</ref> Holmes as a U.S. Supreme Court justice later articulated the test as "dangerous proximity to success" of the crime in a dissent in [[Hyde v. United States|Hyde v. United States (1912)]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Hyde v. United States, 225 U.S. 347 (1912)|url=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/225/347/|access-date=2024-03-20|website=Justia|language=en}}</ref> ====U.S. Model Penal Code==== Under the United States [[Model Penal Code]], for a defendant to be convicted of attempt requires that they perform a "substantial step in a course of conduct planned to culminate in [the defendant's] commission of the crime" (MPC 5.01(1)(c)).
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)