Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Cemex
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Recent history (2006β)=== Shortly after the apparent finalization of the Rinker deal in 2007, the United States Department of Justice brought an antitrust lawsuit against CEMEX, blocking the acquisition.<ref>Source: https://www.fullconcretecontractors.com/us-doj-blocks-cemex-acquisition-of-rinker/</ref> After a lengthy process, CEMEX complied with regulators by divesting (selling) 40+ cement and concrete plants formerly part of itself or Rinker, essentially devaluing the initial deal.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.justice.gov/atr/cases/f243500/243560.htm|title = Second Modified Final Judgment|date = 25 June 2015}}</ref> In April 2008, the President of [[Venezuela]], [[Hugo ChΓ‘vez]], announced the nationalization of "the whole cement industry" in that country, in response to the belief that the industry was exporting its products in order to receive prices above those it was allowed within the country.<ref>[https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hugo-chavez-nationalizes-cement-industry/ Hugo Chavez Nationalizes Cement Industry], CBS News, April 4, 2008.</ref> In mid-2008 the Venezuelan government took over the Venezuelan operations of CEMEX, the largest Venezuelan producer with around a 50% market share; a deal on compensation was still to be reached in March 2009,<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/reutersEdge/idUSTRE5243CX20090305 |title=FACTBOX: Venezuela's nationalizations under Hugo Chavez |date=March 5, 2009 |work=Reuters}}</ref> despite agreements being reached in mid-2008 with the other two major cement producers.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/19/business/worldbusiness/19cement.html |work=The New York Times |title=Venezuela Is Set to Take Control of Cemex Plants |date=August 19, 2008 |access-date=April 28, 2010}}</ref> In December 2011, an agreement was reached, with Cemex receiving $600m in compensation, and benefiting from the cancellation of $154m in debt.<ref>Cemex, [http://www.cemex.com/MediaCenter/PressReleases/PressRelease20111201.aspx CEMEX and Venezuela sign agreement on compensation for nationalization of CEMEX Venezuela] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120122123105/http://www.cemex.com/MediaCenter/PressReleases/PressRelease20111201.aspx |date=January 22, 2012}}</ref> After having problems with the Mexican peso devaluation of 2008, including problems with derivatives,<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN0931861120081009 |work=Reuters |title=UPDATE 2-Mexico's Cemex tumbles on peso, derivatives |date=October 9, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.fool.com/investing/international/2008/10/10/precarious-peso-pounds-cemex.aspx|title = Precarious Peso Pounds Cemex|date = 10 October 2008}}</ref> CEMEX had to rethink its international standings to decrease debt and avoid a default. In June 2009, CEMEX sold its Australian operations to [[Holcim]] for [[Australian dollar|A$]] 2.2 billion ([[US$]]1.75 billion) helping refinance its US$14 billion debt, which partly was due to the acquisition, two years earlier, of the [[Rinker Group]].<ref>{{cite news |last=Battersby |first=Lucy |title=Mexican sell-off puts Australian concrete operations in Swiss hands |work=[[The Sydney Morning Herald]] |url=http://www.businessday.com.au/business/mexican-selloff-puts-australian-concrete-operations-in-swiss-hands-20090615-caqg.html |access-date=2009-07-07}}</ref> In December 2010, DOL Resolves Employee Back Wage Case With CEMEX β The U.S. Department of Labor announced the filing of a consent judgment in a case against CEMEX Inc. and the recovery of $1,514,449 in overtime back wages for 1,705 current and former ready-mix drivers who worked in eight states.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://nessaccess.com/news_2010/dol_resolves_employee_back_wage_case_with_cemex.html|title=DOL Resolves Employee Back Wage Case With CEMEX|website=nessaccess.com|access-date=2016-12-22|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304045048/http://nessaccess.com/news_2010/dol_resolves_employee_back_wage_case_with_cemex.html|archive-date=2016-03-04|url-status=usurped}}</ref> In 2016, Cemex sold its Rinker Materials pipe business to Quikrete.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.powderbulksolids.com/wire-cloth/cemex-selling-us-reinforced-concrete-pipe-unit-500m | title=CEMEX Selling U.S. Reinforced Concrete Pipe Unit for $500M | date=29 November 2016 }}</ref> In February 2018, the company reported record earnings of $750 million for all of 2016, the highest in a decade. Lowering company debt after recent acquisitions were a main cause of the company's financial performance.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.barrons.com/articles/cemex-jumps-on-record-earnings-1486672741|title=Cemex Jumps On Record Earnings|last=DeFotis |first=Dimitra|access-date=2018-03-02|language=en-US}}</ref> In the second-quarter 2021 CEMEX reported a net profit of US$270 million and a Debt-to-Ebitda 2.85 leverage ratio, within investment-grade range.<ref>{{Cite news|date=2021-07-29|title=UPDATE 3-Mexican cement maker Cemex profit boosted to $270 million in construction rebound|language=en|work=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/cemex-results-idUSL4N2P52FK|access-date=2021-07-30}}</ref> In July 2022, Cemex acquired majority stake in ProStein, a German aggregates producer.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2022-07-11 |title=Mexico's Cemex acquires majority stake in German aggregates producer |language=en |work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/markets/deals/mexicos-cemex-acquires-majority-stake-german-aggregates-producer-2022-07-11/ |access-date=2022-07-15}}</ref> In 2023, the U.S. [[National Labor Relations Board]] affirmed findings that Cemex had committed over two dozen [[Unfair labor practice|unfair labor practices]] leading up to a 2019 [[Trade union|union]] election. The board used this case to set a new policy that an employer who interferes with an election will be compelled to recognize the union without an election, where previously a new election would be ordered.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Wiessner |first=Daniel |date=2023-08-25 |title=NLRB paves way for workers to unionize without formal elections |url=https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/nlrb-paves-way-workers-unionize-without-formal-elections-2023-08-25/ |access-date=2024-03-16 |work=[[Reuters]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Unions Score Big Win as NLRB Eases Path to Representation (3) |url=https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/unions-score-big-win-as-labor-board-resurrects-joy-silk-doctrine |access-date=2024-03-16 |website=news.bloomberglaw.com |date=25 August 2023 |language=en}}</ref> The case marked a significant new policy which partly revived the [[Joy Silk]] doctrine.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Board Issues Decision Announcing New Framework for Union Representation Proceedings {{!}} National Labor Relations Board |url=https://www.nlrb.gov/news-outreach/news-story/board-issues-decision-announcing-new-framework-for-union-representation |access-date=2024-03-16 |website=www.nlrb.gov |language=en}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)