Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Confield
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Composition == {{Listen | filename = Autechre - Pen Expers.mp3 | title = "Pen Expers" | description = The third track from ''Confield''. "Pen Expers" has been likened to a drill 'n' bass track with hard percussion and high-pitched melodies. }} ''Confield'' has been described as [[Intelligent dance music|IDM]],<ref name="allmusic">{{cite web |url=https://www.allmusic.com/album/confield-mw0000003112 |title=Confield β Autechre |website=[[AllMusic]] |accessdate=6 July 2012 |last=Bush |first=John |archive-date=21 June 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120621234437/http://www.allmusic.com/album/confield-mw0000003112 |url-status=live }}</ref> experimental,<ref name="allmusic" /> electronic,<ref name="spin">{{cite journal |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=f4iBwoaNrbcC&pg=PT10 |title=Autechre: Confield / Built to Spill: Ancient Melodies of the Future |journal=[[Spin (magazine)|Spin]] |volume=17 |issue=8 |date=August 2001 |accessdate=9 December 2018 |last=Weisbard |first=Eric |pages=136β38}}</ref> [[electronica]],<ref name="guardian">{{cite news |last1=Aizlewood |first1=John |last2=Denselow |first2=Robin |last3=Williams |first3=Richard |last4=Sullivan |first4=Caroline |last5=Wyse |first5=Pascal |last6=Aizlewood |first6=John |title=We will rock you |url=https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2001/apr/27/shopping.culture2 |access-date=28 January 2025 |work=[[The Guardian]] |date=27 April 2001 |archive-date=19 April 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160419070846/http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2001/apr/27/shopping.culture2 |url-status=live }}</ref> and [[abstract music|abstract]].<ref name="allmusic" /> In a review for ''[[Pitchfork (website)|Pitchfork]]'', Malcolm Seymour III described how abstract the album was in comparison to the duo's previous projects.<ref name="pitchfork">{{cite news |last1=Seymour III |first1=Malcolm |title=Autechre: Confield Album Review |url=https://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/365-confield/ |access-date=28 January 2025 |work=[[Pitchfork (website)|Pitchfork]] |date=17 April 2001 |archive-date=20 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200420225826/https://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/365-confield/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Seymour III also stated how ''Confield'' was a lot less accessible to newer listeners compared to Autechre's previous projects.<ref name="pitchfork" /> Mike Barnes of ''[[The Independent]]'' called the music harsh but beautiful, noting its repetitive beats and its complex rhythms throughout.<ref name="barnes" /> In a retrospective review of ''Tri Repetae'' for ''[[The Quietus]]'', Gary Suarez noted how the album treated melodies like "bitter foes", with sounds being [[Audio time stretching and pitch scaling|timestretched]] and manipulated.<ref name="triquietus" /> Louise Bradbury of ''[[OffBeat (music magazine)|OffBeat]]'' noted how melodies "took secondseat" with ''Confield'', with sweeping percussive elements being the main focus of the album.<ref name="ob">{{cite magazine |author=Louise Bradbury |date=1 June 2001 |title=Music Reviews|url= |magazine=[[OffBeat (music magazine)|OffBeat]] |location= |issue=160 |issn=1090-0810 |page=20}}</ref> Tony Naylor of ''[[NME]]'' called "Sim Gishel" a track with atmospheric, stifled melodies and disjointed beats.<ref name="NME">{{cite journal |url=https://www.nme.com/reviews/autechre/4997 |title=Autechre : Confield |journal=[[NME]] |date=11 May 2001 |accessdate=28 January 2025 |last=Naylor |first=Tony |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130223054842/http://www.nme.com/reviews/autechre/4997 |archivedate=23 February 2013}}</ref> "Eidetic Casin" was also noted for its "iridescent chimes".<ref name="NME" /> Pascal Wyse of ''[[The Guardian]]'' commented on the "strange sampled snoring" of "Uviol" and the melodies resembling voices on "Lentic Cathachresis".<ref name="guardian" /> In a review for [[AllMusic]], John Bush described "Cfern" as a track that "keeps listeners guessing" with conflicting rhythms and confusing beats.<ref name="allmusic" /> Bush also said the opener "VI Scose Poise" contained "bouncing-ball-in-a-ring-modulator production" along with melodies in the minor key.<ref name="allmusic" /> Seymour III compared "Pen Expers" to [[Drill 'n' bass|drill 'n' bass]] with "vacuum-navigated" percussion.<ref name="pitchfork" /> "Parhelic Triangle" contains a brooding baseline and a variety of chimes; Seymour III compared the track to "Acroyear2" from ''[[LP5]]''.<ref name="pitchfork" /> In ''Sounding Art'', Katharine Norman stated "Bine" contained warped drum machines and disordered sounds.<ref name="soundingart">{{cite book |last1=Norman |first1=Katharine |title=Sounding Art: Eight Literary Excursions through Electronic Music |date=2004 |publisher=[[Routledge]] |location=Aldershot |isbn=9780754604266 |page=156}}</ref> Norman compared the track to a "machine gone mad".<ref name="soundingart" />
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)