Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Corporate transparency
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== China == In 2008, researchers found that value maximization might not be the ultimate goal of Chinese listed companies as a result of the Chinese government being the major shareholder of [[state-owned enterprises]] (SOE). Comparing listed companies in different markets, it seems that those with sound corporate governance practices tend to showcase relatively good performance, which was in contrast to the situation in the Chinese market. It was believed that implementation of new reforms would result in higher corporate transparency of Chinese firms.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=CHEUNG |first1=Yan-Leung |last2=JIANG |first2=Ping |last3=LIMPAPHAYOM |first3=Piman |last4=LU |first4=Tong |title=Does corporate governance matter in China? |journal=China Economic Review |date=September 2008 |volume=19 |issue=3 |pages=460β479 |doi=10.1016/j.chieco.2008.01.002 }}</ref> In 2002, the [[China Securities Regulatory Commission]] (CSRC) issued a code of corporate governance affecting practices and structures employed by Chinese firms. One year later, the CSRC allowed qualified foreign [[institutional investors]] (QFII) to enter the Chinese stock market. It was found that QFIIs have greater control over state shareholders in state-owned companies than domestic mutual funds and are more prone to act as unbiased monitoring body.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Huang |first1=Wei |last2=Zhu |first2=Tao |title=Foreign institutional investors and corporate governance in emerging markets: Evidence of a split-share structure reform in China |journal=Journal of Corporate Finance |date=June 2015 |volume=32 |pages=312β326 |doi=10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.10.013 |s2cid=3366775 }}</ref> Institutional ownership has positive effect on both, corporate governance transparency and accounting information transparency. However, there is not sufficient amount of evidence to support the claim that higher levels of corporate transparency lead to higher levels of institutional ownership in China.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Liu |first1=Ningyue |last2=Laing |first2=Elaine |last3=Cao |first3=Yue |last4=Zhang |first4=Xiaofei |title=Institutional ownership and corporate transparency in China |journal=Finance Research Letters |date=March 2018 |volume=24 |pages=328β336 |doi=10.1016/j.frl.2017.12.001 }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)