Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Data General RDOS
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Antitrust lawsuit== In the late 1970s, Data General was sued (under the Sherman and Clayton antitrust acts)<ref>{{cite book|title=Santa Clara computer and high-technology law journal|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=C0JMAQAAIAAJ|year=1986}}</ref> by competitors for their practice of bundling RDOS with the Data General Nova or Eclipse minicomputer.<ref name="Justia1">{{cite web|title=In Re Data General Corp. Antitrust Litigation, 529 F. Supp. 801 (N.D. Cal. 1981)|url=http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/529/801/2355387/|website=Justia|access-date=26 December 2016}}</ref> When Data General introduced the [[Data General Nova]], a company called Digidyne wanted to use its RDOS [[operating system]] on its own [[Clone (computing)|hardware clone]]. Data General refused to [[Software license|license their software]] and claimed their "bundling rights". In 1985, courts including the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit]] ruled against Data General in a case called ''Digidyne v. Data General''. The [[Supreme Court of the United States]] [[Certiorari|declined to hear]] Data General's appeal, although [[Associate Justice|Justices]] [[Byron White|White]] and [[Harry Blackmun|Blackmun]] [[List of United States Supreme Court copyright case law#Dissents to denials of certiorari|would have heard it]]. The precedent set by the lower courts eventually forced Data General to license the operating system because restricting the software to only Data General's hardware was an illegal tying arrangement.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Myers |first=Gary |title=Tying Arrangements and the Computer Industry: Digidyne Corp. vs. Data General |journal=Duke Law Journal |volume=1985 |issue=5 |pages=1027β1056 |date=November 1985 |doi=10.2307/1372482 |jstor=1372482|url=https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2927&context=dlj |url-access=subscription }}</ref> In 1999, Data General was taken over by [[EMC Corporation]].<ref name="Inc.1999">{{cite journal|author=InfoWorld Media Group, Inc.|title=InfoWorld|journal=InfoWorld: The Newspaper for the Microcomputing Community|url=https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_YUoEAAAAMBAJ|date=16 August 1999|publisher=InfoWorld Media Group, Inc.|pages=[https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_YUoEAAAAMBAJ/page/n67 12]β|issn=0199-6649}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)