Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Decay theory
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Short-term memory=== Within the [[short-term memory]] system, evidence favours an interference theory of forgetting, based on various researchers' manipulation of the amount of time between a participant's retention and recall stages finding little to no effect on how many items they are able to remember.<ref name="emone" /> Looking solely at verbal short-term memory within studies that control against participants' use of rehearsal processes, a very small temporal decay effect coupled with a much larger interference decay effect can be found.<ref name="emtwo" /> No evidence for temporal decay in verbal short-term memory has been found in recent studies of serial recall tasks.<ref name="emtwo" /> Regarding the word-length effect in short-term memory, which states that lists of longer word are harder to recall than lists of short words, researchers argue that interference plays a larger role due to articulation duration being confounded with other word characteristics.<ref name="emthree">{{cite journal | vauthors = Lewandowsky S, Oberauer K | title = The word-length effect provides no evidence for decay in short-term memory | journal = Psychonomic Bulletin & Review | volume = 15 | issue = 5 | pages = 875β88 | date = October 2008 | pmid = 18926980 | doi = 10.3758/PBR.15.5.875 | s2cid = 9604394 | doi-access = free }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)