Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Decimation (punishment)
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Revival during the first century === [[File:Bust of a Roman, Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek.jpg|thumb|Bust traditionally identified as depicting Marcus Licinius Crassus]] The first historical instance of decimation was in 72 BC under the command of [[Marcus Licinius Crassus]] during the [[Third Servile War]]. A unit of 500 men who fled from battle was decimated, with some fifty men executed. The narrative in Appian that Crassus decimated either two legions or his entire army (producing fatalities of around 1,000 and 4,000 respectively) are rejected as exaggerations.<ref>{{harvnb|Taylor|2022|p=117}}; {{harvnb|Pearson|2019|p=684}}; {{harvnb|Faszcza|2018|p=86 n. 5}}; {{harvnb|Goldberg|2015|p=144 n. 14}}, noting "Appian's version is a slight corruption of the one given by Plutarch; his second is an incredible exaggeration" and citing {{cite book |last=Brunt |first=P A |year=1971 |title=Italian manpower |page=450 |ref=none |mode=cs2}}.</ref> The historian Michael Taylor identifies three major factors for this revival. First, the war being fought was against a slave revolt and therefore constituted a genuine emergency for the Roman state, especially after the defeat of that year's consuls' armies.<ref>Similarly to Taylor, {{harvnb|Faszcza|2018|p=86}}.</ref> Second, the ascendency of the Sullan regime in the aftermath of the [[Sulla's civil war|recent civil war]] and its [[Sulla's proscription|proscriptions]] may have set a precedent for ignoring citizen ''provocatio'' rights against arbitrary punishment. Third, there was at the time an elite antiquarian intellectual movement which may have suggested to Crassus the hitherto unprecedented option to reviving a punishment last used, if at all, centuries previously.{{sfn|Taylor|2022|pp=117β18}} Indeed, by the first century BC, the Romans had no knowledge of the practice's origins.{{sfn|Pearson|2019|p=667, noting Cicero and Livy's attribution to "unspecified forefathers" and citing: Cicero, ''Pro Cluentio'', 46.128; {{harvnb|Livy|loc=5.6.14β17}}}} The exigencies of the moment may have been sufficient to insulate Crassus from any social or political punishment for his unprecedented actions, which may have also set the precedent for ignoring ''provocatio'' rights on campaign, even if contrary to law.{{sfn|Faszcza|2018|pp=91β92, 94β95}} After Crassus' use in 72 BC, the next possible instances were under [[Julius Caesar]] in 49 BC and [[Mark Antony]] in 44. However, both were applied only to small groups (in the former killing a tenth of the 120 ringleaders of a mutiny) or with a smaller proportion (in the latter Cicero describes only a targeted killing of supposedly disloyal centurions).{{sfn|Taylor|2022|p=118, citing Cicero, ''Phillipicae'', 3.4, 5.22.}} Further instances appear during the civil war where Caesar's soldiers demand decimation to forego demobilisation in the aftermath of mutiny or defeat. In these instances, decimation was brought up essentially to demonstrate absolute loyalty to Caesar, who in all cases refused.<ref>{{harvnb|Taylor|2022|p=116}}; {{harvnb|Faszcza|2018|p=96}}. See also {{cite book |last=Goldsworthy |first=Adrian |title=Caesar: life of a colossus |publisher=Yale University Press |location=New Haven |year=2006 |page=407}}</ref> The latter instance, if Appian is to believed, also failed to restore discipline, instead increasing anger against Antony's command.{{sfn|Taylor|2022|p=118, citing Appian, ''Bellum civile'', 3.43}} A further instance in 39 BC under [[Gnaeus Domitius Calvinus]], proconsular governor of Spain, is documented in Dio: however, the more contemporary source Velleius Paterculus reports only the execution of the fleeing unit's commander.{{sfn|Taylor|2022|p=118, citing: {{harvnb|Dio|loc=48.42.2}}; Velleius Paterculus, 2.78.3}} The next firmly documented instance was in 36 BC when Mark Antony decimated two cohorts after defeats against the Parthians, producing some 80 fatalities. Plutarch's biography attests that after a [[Antony's Parthian War|defeat in Media]]: {{quote| Antony was enraged, and visited those who had played the coward with what is called decimation. That is, he divided the whole number of them into tens, and put to death that one from each ten upon whom the lot fell. For the rest he ordered rations of barley instead of wheat.{{sfn|Plutarch, ''Antony''|loc=39.7}} }} A second instance follows in 34 BC under [[Octavian]] for a unit which fled during his campaign in [[Illyricum (Roman province)|Illyricum]].{{sfn|Taylor|2022|p=118, citing: {{harvnb|Plutarch, ''Antony''|loc=44.3}}; {{harvnb|Dio|loc=48.38.3}}; and dismissing {{harvnb|Suetonius, ''Augustus''|loc=24.2}}, which states that Octavian used the punishment regularly}} After this instance in 34, over fifty years elapse before the next under Lucius Apronius {{circa|AD 18β20}} for defeats in Numidia and then another fifty years elapse to [[Galba]]'s usage during the [[Year of the Four Emperors]] against a unit of soldiers who refused to be demoted to naval service.{{sfn|Taylor|2022|p=119, citing {{harvnb|Tactius, ''Annales''|loc=3.21}}; {{harvnb|Suetonius, ''Galba''|loc=12.4}} }}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)