Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Definition of planet
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Planets in the Middle Ages === [[File:Copernican heliocentrism diagram-2.jpg|thumb|Sketch of the heliocentric model of the Solar System by Copernicus]] Medieval and Renaissance writers generally accepted the idea of seven planets. The standard medieval introduction to astronomy, [[Sacrobosco]]'s ''[[De sphaera mundi|De Sphaera]]'', includes the Sun and Moon among the planets,<ref>Sacrobosco, "On the Sphere", in Edward Grant, ed. ''A Source Book in Medieval Science,'' (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974), p. 450. "every planet except the sun has an epicycle."</ref> the more advanced ''Theorica planetarum'' presents the "theory of the seven planets,"<ref>Anonymous, "The Theory of the Planets," in Edward Grant, ed. ''A Source Book in Medieval Science,'' (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974), p. 452.</ref> while the instructions to the ''[[Alfonsine Tables]]'' show how "to find by means of tables the mean ''motuses'' of the sun, moon, and the rest of the planets."<ref>[[John of Saxony (astronomer)|John of Saxony]], "Extracts from the Alfonsine Tables and Rules for their use", in Edward Grant, ed. ''A Source Book in Medieval Science,'' (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974), p. 466.</ref> In his ''[[Confessio Amantis]]'', 14th-century poet [[John Gower]], referring to the planets' connection with the craft of [[Classical planets in Western alchemy|alchemy]], writes, "Of the planetes ben begonne/The gold is tilted to the Sonne/The Mone of Selver hath his part...", indicating that the Sun and the Moon were planets.<ref>{{cite journal|author=P. Heather|title=The Seven Planets|journal=Folklore|year=1943|pages=338β361|doi=10.1080/0015587x.1943.9717687|volume=54|issue=3}}</ref> Even [[Nicolaus Copernicus]], who rejected the geocentric model, was ambivalent concerning whether the Sun and Moon were planets. In his ''[[De Revolutionibus]]'', Copernicus clearly separates "the sun, moon, planets and stars";<ref name=koper>{{cite web|title=The text of Nicholas Copernicus' De Revolutionibus (On the Revolutions), 1543 C.E.|author=Edward Rosen (trans.)|work=Calendars Through the Ages|url=http://webexhibits.org/calendars/year-text-Copernicus.html|access-date=February 28, 2007}}</ref> however, in his Dedication of the work to Pope Paul III, Copernicus refers to, "the motion of the sun and the moon... and of the five other planets."<ref>{{cite web|title=Dedication of the Revolutions of the Heavenly Bodies to Pope Paul III|author=Nicolaus Copernicus|work=The Harvard Classics. 1909β14|url=http://www.bartleby.com/39/12.html|access-date=February 23, 2007}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)