Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Dirac delta function
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Definitions== The Dirac delta function <math>\delta (x)</math> can be loosely thought of as a function on the real line which is zero everywhere except at the origin, where it is infinite, <math display="block">\delta(x) \simeq \begin{cases} +\infty, & x = 0 \\ 0, & x \ne 0 \end{cases}</math> and which is also constrained to satisfy the identity{{sfn|Gelfand|Shilov|1966–1968|loc=Volume I, §1.1, p. 1}} <math display="block">\int_{-\infty}^\infty \delta(x) \, dx = 1.</math> This is merely a [[heuristic]] characterization. The Dirac delta is not a function in the traditional sense as no [[extended real number]] valued function defined on the real numbers has these properties.{{sfn|Dirac|1930|p=63}} ===As a measure=== One way to rigorously capture the notion of the Dirac delta function is to define a [[Measure (mathematics)|measure]], called [[Dirac measure]], which accepts a subset {{mvar|A}} of the real line {{math|'''R'''}} as an argument, and returns {{math|1=''δ''(''A'') = 1}} if {{math|0 ∈ ''A''}}, and {{math|1=''δ''(''A'') = 0}} otherwise.<ref name="Rudin 1966 loc=§1.20">{{harvnb|Rudin|1966|loc=§1.20}}</ref> If the delta function is conceptualized as modeling an idealized point mass at 0, then {{math|''δ''(''A'')}} represents the mass contained in the set {{mvar|A}}. One may then define the integral against {{mvar|δ}} as the integral of a function against this mass distribution. Formally, the [[Lebesgue integral]] provides the necessary analytic device. The Lebesgue integral with respect to the measure {{mvar|δ}} satisfies <math display="block">\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(x) \, \delta(dx) = f(0)</math> for all continuous compactly supported functions {{mvar|f}}. The measure {{mvar|δ}} is not [[absolutely continuous]] with respect to the [[Lebesgue measure]]—in fact, it is a [[singular measure]]. Consequently, the delta measure has no [[Radon–Nikodym derivative]] (with respect to Lebesgue measure)—no true function for which the property <math display="block">\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(x)\, \delta(x)\, dx = f(0)</math> holds.{{sfn|Hewitt|Stromberg|1963|loc=§19.61}} As a result, the latter notation is a convenient [[abuse of notation]], and not a standard ([[Riemann integral|Riemann]] or [[Lebesgue integral|Lebesgue]]) integral. As a [[probability measure]] on {{math|'''R'''}}, the delta measure is characterized by its [[cumulative distribution function]], which is the [[unit step function]].<ref>{{harvnb|Driggers|2003|p=2321}} See also {{harvnb|Bracewell|1986|loc=Chapter 5}} for a different interpretation. Other conventions for the assigning the value of the Heaviside function at zero exist, and some of these are not consistent with what follows.</ref> <math display="block">H(x) = \begin{cases} 1 & \text{if } x\ge 0\\ 0 & \text{if } x < 0. \end{cases}</math> This means that {{math|''H''(''x'')}} is the integral of the cumulative [[indicator function]] {{math|'''1'''<sub>(−∞, ''x'']</sub>}} with respect to the measure {{mvar|δ}}; to wit, <math display="block">H(x) = \int_{\mathbf{R}}\mathbf{1}_{(-\infty,x]}(t)\,\delta(dt) = \delta\!\left((-\infty,x]\right),</math> the latter being the measure of this interval. Thus in particular the integration of the delta function against a continuous function can be properly understood as a [[Riemann–Stieltjes integral]]:{{sfn|Hewitt|Stromberg|1963|loc=§9.19}} <math display="block">\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(x)\,\delta(dx) = \int_{-\infty}^\infty f(x) \,dH(x).</math> All higher [[moment (mathematics)|moments]] of {{mvar|δ}} are zero. In particular, [[characteristic function (probability theory)|characteristic function]] and [[moment generating function]] are both equal to one. ===As a distribution=== In the theory of [[distribution (mathematics)|distributions]], a generalized function is considered not a function in itself but only through how it affects other functions when "integrated" against them.{{sfn|Hazewinkel|2011|p=[{{google books |plainurl=y |id=_YPtCAAAQBAJ|page=41}} 41]}} In keeping with this philosophy, to define the delta function properly, it is enough to say what the "integral" of the delta function is against a sufficiently "good" '''test function''' {{mvar|φ}}. Test functions are also known as [[bump function]]s. If the delta function is already understood as a measure, then the Lebesgue integral of a test function against that measure supplies the necessary integral. A typical space of test functions consists of all [[smooth function]]s on {{math|'''R'''}} with [[compact support]] that have as many derivatives as required. As a distribution, the Dirac delta is a [[linear functional]] on the space of test functions and is defined by{{sfn|Strichartz|1994|loc=§2.2}} {{NumBlk2|:| <math>\delta[\varphi] = \varphi(0)</math>|1}} for every test function {{mvar|φ}}. For {{mvar|δ}} to be properly a distribution, it must be continuous in a suitable topology on the space of test functions. In general, for a linear functional {{mvar|S}} on the space of test functions to define a distribution, it is necessary and sufficient that, for every positive integer {{mvar|N}} there is an integer {{math|''M''<sub>''N''</sub>}} and a constant {{mvar|''C''<sub>''N''</sub>}} such that for every test function {{mvar|φ}}, one has the inequality{{sfn|Hörmander|1983|loc=Theorem 2.1.5}} <math display="block">\left|S[\varphi]\right| \le C_N \sum_{k=0}^{M_N}\sup_{x\in [-N,N]} \left|\varphi^{(k)}(x)\right|</math> where {{math|sup}} represents the [[Infimum and supremum|supremum]]. With the {{mvar|δ}} distribution, one has such an inequality (with {{math|1=''C''<sub>''N''</sub> = 1)}} with {{math|1=''M''<sub>''N''</sub> = 0}} for all {{mvar|N}}. Thus {{mvar|δ}} is a distribution of order zero. It is, furthermore, a distribution with compact support (the [[support (mathematics)|support]] being {{math|{{brace|0}}}}). The delta distribution can also be defined in several equivalent ways. For instance, it is the [[distributional derivative]] of the [[Heaviside step function]]. This means that for every test function {{mvar|φ}}, one has <math display="block">\delta[\varphi] = -\int_{-\infty}^\infty \varphi'(x)\,H(x)\,dx.</math> Intuitively, if [[integration by parts]] were permitted, then the latter integral should simplify to <math display="block">\int_{-\infty}^\infty \varphi(x)\,H'(x)\,dx = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \varphi(x)\,\delta(x)\,dx,</math> and indeed, a form of integration by parts is permitted for the Stieltjes integral, and in that case, one does have <math display="block">-\int_{-\infty}^\infty \varphi'(x)\,H(x)\, dx = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \varphi(x)\,dH(x).</math> In the context of measure theory, the Dirac measure gives rise to distribution by integration. Conversely, equation ({{EquationNote|1}}) defines a [[Daniell integral]] on the space of all compactly supported continuous functions {{mvar|φ}} which, by the [[Riesz–Markov–Kakutani representation theorem|Riesz representation theorem]], can be represented as the Lebesgue integral of {{mvar|φ}} with respect to some [[Radon measure]]. Generally, when the term ''Dirac delta function'' is used, it is in the sense of distributions rather than measures, the [[Dirac measure]] being among several terms for the corresponding notion in measure theory. Some sources may also use the term ''Dirac delta distribution''. ===Generalizations=== The delta function can be defined in {{mvar|n}}-dimensional [[Euclidean space]] {{math|'''R'''<sup>''n''</sup>}} as the measure such that <math display="block">\int_{\mathbf{R}^n} f(\mathbf{x})\,\delta(d\mathbf{x}) = f(\mathbf{0})</math> for every compactly supported continuous function {{mvar|f}}. As a measure, the {{mvar|n}}-dimensional delta function is the [[product measure]] of the 1-dimensional delta functions in each variable separately. Thus, formally, with {{math|1='''x''' = (''x''<sub>1</sub>, ''x''<sub>2</sub>, ..., ''x''<sub>''n''</sub>)}}, one has{{sfn|Bracewell|1986|loc=Chapter 5}} {{NumBlk2|:|<math>\delta(\mathbf{x}) = \delta(x_1)\,\delta(x_2)\cdots\delta(x_n).</math>|2}} The delta function can also be defined in the sense of distributions exactly as above in the one-dimensional case.{{sfn|Hörmander|1983|loc=§3.1}} However, despite widespread use in engineering contexts, ({{EquationNote|2}}) should be manipulated with care, since the product of distributions can only be defined under quite narrow circumstances.{{sfn|Strichartz|1994|loc=§2.3}}{{sfn|Hörmander|1983|loc=§8.2}} The notion of a '''[[Dirac measure]]''' makes sense on any set.{{sfn|Rudin |1966 |loc=§1.20}} Thus if {{mvar|X}} is a set, {{math|''x''<sub>0</sub> ∈ ''X''}} is a marked point, and {{math|Σ}} is any [[sigma algebra]] of subsets of {{mvar|X}}, then the measure defined on sets {{math|''A'' ∈ Σ}} by <math display="block">\delta_{x_0}(A)=\begin{cases} 1 &\text{if }x_0\in A\\ 0 &\text{if }x_0\notin A \end{cases}</math> is the delta measure or unit mass concentrated at {{math|''x''<sub>0</sub>}}. Another common generalization of the delta function is to a [[differentiable manifold]] where most of its properties as a distribution can also be exploited because of the [[differentiable structure]]. The delta function on a manifold {{mvar|M}} centered at the point {{math|''x''<sub>0</sub> ∈ ''M''}} is defined as the following distribution: {{NumBlk2|:|<math>\delta_{x_0}[\varphi] = \varphi(x_0)</math>|3}} for all compactly supported smooth real-valued functions {{mvar|φ}} on {{mvar|M}}.{{sfn|Dieudonné|1972|loc=§17.3.3}} A common special case of this construction is a case in which {{mvar|M}} is an [[open set]] in the Euclidean space {{math|'''R'''<sup>''n''</sup>}}. On a [[locally compact Hausdorff space]] {{mvar|X}}, the Dirac delta measure concentrated at a point {{mvar|x}} is the [[Radon measure]] associated with the Daniell integral ({{EquationNote|3}}) on compactly supported continuous functions {{mvar|φ}}.<ref>{{Cite book|last1=Krantz|first1=Steven G.|url={{google books |plainurl=y |id=X_BKmVphIcsC&q }}|title=Geometric Integration Theory|last2=Parks|first2=Harold R.|date=2008-12-15|publisher=Springer Science & Business Media|isbn=978-0-8176-4679-0|language=en}}</ref> At this level of generality, calculus as such is no longer possible, however a variety of techniques from abstract analysis are available. For instance, the mapping <math>x_0\mapsto \delta_{x_0}</math> is a continuous embedding of {{mvar|X}} into the space of finite Radon measures on {{mvar|X}}, equipped with its [[vague topology]]. Moreover, the [[convex hull]] of the image of {{mvar|X}} under this embedding is [[dense set|dense]] in the space of probability measures on {{mvar|X}}.{{sfn|Federer|1969|loc=§2.5.19}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)