Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Equalization payments
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Canada== {{main article|Equalization payments in Canada}} {{Canadian Transfer Payments}} {{Update|section|date=February 2010}} In [[Canada]], the [[Government of Canada]] makes payments to less wealthy [[Canadian provinces]] to equalize the provinces' "fiscal capacity"βtheir ability to generate tax revenues. In 2009β2010, six provinces received a total of {{CAD|14.2 billion|link=yes}} in equalization payments from the federal government.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.fin.gc.ca/fedprov/eqp-eng.asp |title=Government of Canada website on equalization payments |access-date=2009-02-07 |archive-date=2013-12-20 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131220173250/http://www.fin.gc.ca/fedprov/eqp-eng.asp |url-status=dead }}</ref> Until the 2009-2010 fiscal year, [[Ontario]] was the only province to have never received equalization payments. Canada's territories are not included in the equalization program - the federal government addresses territorial fiscal needs through the [[Territorial Formula Financing]] (TFF) program. Equalization payments are based on a formula that calculates the difference between the per capita revenue yield that a particular province would obtain using average tax rates and the national average per capita revenue yield at average tax rates. The current formula considers five major revenue sources (see below). The objective of the program is to ensure that all provinces have access to per capita revenues equal to the potential average of all ten provinces. The formula is based solely on revenues and does not consider the cost of providing services or the expenditure need of the provinces. Equalization payments do not, technically, involve wealthy provinces making payments to poor provinces, although in practice this is what happens, via the federal treasury. As an example, a wealthy citizen in New Brunswick, a so-called "have not" province, pays more into equalization than a poorer citizen in Alberta, a so-called "have" province. However, because of Alberta's greater wealth, the citizens of Alberta as a whole are net contributors to Equalization, while the citizens of New Brunswick are net receivers of Equalization payments. Equalization payments are one example of what are often collectively referred to in [[Canada]] as "transfer payments", a term used in other jurisdictions to refer to cash payments to individuals (see [[Canadian Transfer Payments]]). In fact, there are four types of federal transfers to provinces and territories: the Canada Health Transfer (CHT), the Canada Social Transfer (CST), Equalization, and Territorial Formula Financing (TFF). Moreover, the federal government has entered into particular arrangements with certain provinces β Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador, in particular β under which offset payments are made to the governments of these provinces for the development of offshore oil and gas reserves.<ref>[http://etatscanadiens-canadiangovernments.enap.ca/en/nav.aspx?sortcode=2.0.3.1 Canadian Governments Compared, ''Federal Transfers'']</ref> The money the provinces receive through equalization can be spent in any way the provincial government desires. The payments help guarantee "reasonably comparable levels" of [[health care]], [[education]], and [[Welfare (financial aid)|welfare]] in all the provinces. The definition of "reasonably comparable levels", however, has been the subject of considerable debate. In 2009β2010, the total amount of the program was roughly {{CAD|14.2|link=no}} billion.{{Obsolete source|reason=|date=February 2020}} Recent negotiations surrounding the renewal of the program have created considerable tension among provinces. Due to the zero-sum nature of the formula, increases in entitlements for some provinces necessarily lead to decreases for others.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)