Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Eugene Volokh
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Politics== Volokh is commonly described as politically conservative or libertarian.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Beckett|first1=Lois|title=Milwaukee sheriff says it's 'pitchforks and torches time' and stands by Trump|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/15/milwaukee-sheriff-david-clarke-pitchforks-torches-time-twitter|access-date=September 18, 2017|work=The Guardian|date=October 15, 2016|quote=Eugene Volokh, a Libertarian second amendment scholar|archive-date=September 1, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170901192742/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/15/milwaukee-sheriff-david-clarke-pitchforks-torches-time-twitter|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Berrier|first1=Justin|title=The Volokh Conspiracy And Washington Post's Move To The Right|url=https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2014/01/22/the-volokh-conspiracy-and-washington-posts-move/197694|access-date=September 18, 2017|work=Media Matters for America blog|date=January 22, 2014|archive-date=October 11, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171011214504/https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2014/01/22/the-volokh-conspiracy-and-washington-posts-move/197694|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2012, one commentator described Volokh's politics as "soft libertarian", and Volokh as an "unpredictable libertarian-leaning" writer.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Brooks|first1=David|title=Election loss focuses attention on new conservative views|url=https://www.chron.com/opinion/outlook/article/Brooks-Election-loss-focuses-attention-on-new-4054781.php|access-date=September 18, 2017|work=Houston Chronicle|date=November 20, 2012|archive-date=March 1, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180301044346/https://www.chron.com/opinion/outlook/article/Brooks-Election-loss-focuses-attention-on-new-4054781.php|url-status=live}}</ref> He has been a longtime member of the [[Federalist Society]] since he first joined in the 1980s.<ref>{{cite news|date=April 25, 2014|last=Volokh|first=Eugene|title= Federalist Society's second annual Executive Branch Review Conference|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/04/25/federalist-societys-second-annual-executive-branch-review-conference/|newspaper=The Washington Post|quote=I’ve been a member of the Federalist Society for over 25 years (since before I even went to law school), I’m involved with the Federalist Society’s Free Speech & Election Law Practice Group, and I often give talks (which generally come with honoraria) at Federalist Society local chapters.}}</ref> In the [[2008 United States presidential election|2008 presidential election]], Volokh supported former Tennessee Senator [[Fred Thompson]], saying Thompson had good instincts on legal issues and that he preferred Thompson's positions on the [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|First Amendment]] and political speech to [[John McCain]]'s sponsorship of [[Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act|campaign finance reform]]. Volokh also liked Thompson's position in favor of [[Gun politics in the United States|individual gun ownership]].<ref name=Thompson>[[Emily Bazelon|Bazelon, Emily]] (November 26, 2007) [http://www.slate.com/id/2177688/ On the advice of counsel] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110819072132/http://www.slate.com/id/2177688/ |date=2011-08-19 }}, Slate.com; accessed February 27, 2018.</ref> He noted that Thompson "takes federalism seriously, and he seems to have a fairly deep-seated sense that there is a real difference between state and federal power."<ref name=Thompson/> Volokh is a supporter of [[same-sex marriage]].<ref>{{cite web|title=Freedom to Marry, Freedom to Dissent: Why We Must Have Both|url=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2014/04/22/freedom_to_marry_freedom_to_dissent_why_we_must_have_both_122376.html|date=April 22, 2014|access-date=February 27, 2018|archive-date=April 27, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190427095130/https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2014/04/22/freedom_to_marry_freedom_to_dissent_why_we_must_have_both_122376.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)