Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Genocide
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Development === [[File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-1983-0422-315, Umsiedler auf dem Güterbahnhof Berlin-Pankow.jpg|thumb|The [[expulsion of Germans]] was one of the instances of [[state violence]] that was deliberately written out of the legal definition of genocide.{{sfn|Weiss-Wendt|2017|pp=267–268}}]] According to the [[Nuremberg Charter|legal instrument]] used to prosecute defeated German leaders at the [[International Military Tribunal]] at Nuremberg, [[atrocity crimes]] were only prosecutable by international justice if they were committed as part of an [[crime of aggression|illegal war of aggression]]. The powers prosecuting the trial were unwilling to restrict a government's actions against its own citizens.{{sfn|Irvin-Erickson|2023|p=20}} In order to criminalize peacetime genocide, Lemkin brought his proposal to criminalize genocide to the newly established [[United Nations]] in 1946.{{sfn |Irvin-Erickson |2023|p=20}} Opposition to the convention was greater than Lemkin expected due to states' concerns that it would lead their own policies—including treatment of [[indigenous peoples]], [[European colonialism]], [[racial segregation in the United States]], and [[Soviet nationalities policy]]—to be labeled genocide. Before the convention was passed, powerful countries (both Western powers and the Soviet Union) secured changes in an attempt to make the convention unenforceable and applicable to their [[Cold War|geopolitical rivals]]' actions but not their own.{{sfn|Irvin-Erickson|2023|pp=20–21}} Few formerly colonized countries were represented and "most states had no interest in empowering their victims– past, present, and future".{{sfn|Bachman|2021b|p=1021}} The result severely diluted Lemkin's original concept;{{sfn|Curthoys|Docker|2008|pp=13–14}} he privately considered it a failure.{{sfn|Irvin-Erickson|2023|pp=20–21}} Lemkin's anti-colonial conception of genocide was transformed into one that favored colonial powers.{{sfn|Irvin-Erickson|2023|p=22}}{{sfn|Bachman|2021b|p=1020}} Among the violence freed from the stigma of genocide was the destruction of political groups, which the Soviet Union is particularly blamed for blocking.{{sfn|Weiss-Wendt|2017|p=4}}{{sfn|Bachman|2022|p=53}}{{sfn|Curthoys|Docker|2008|pp=13–14}} Although Lemkin credited women's NGOs with securing the passage of the convention, the gendered violence of forced pregnancy, marriage, and divorce was left out.{{sfn|Irvin-Erickson|2023|p=8}} Additionally omitted was [[ethnic cleansing|the forced migration of populations]]—which had been carried out by the Soviet Union and its satellites, condoned by the Western Allies, [[expulsion of Germans|against millions of Germans from central and Eastern Europe]].{{sfn|Weiss-Wendt|2017|pp=267–268, 283}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)