Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Gibberish
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Gobbledygook=== The term "gobbledygook" has a long history of use in politics to deride deliberately obscure statements and complicated but ineffective explanations. The following are a few examples: * [[Richard Nixon]]'s [[Nixon White House tapes|Oval Office tape]] from June 14, 1971, showed [[H. R. Haldeman]] describing a situation to Nixon as "... a bunch of gobbledygook. But out of the gobbledygook comes a very clear thing: You can't trust the government; you can't believe what they say."<ref>{{cite book |last=Wheen |first=Francis |year=2010 |title=Strange Days Indeed: The Golden Age of Paranoia |publisher=Public Affairs |isbn=978-0-00-744120-4 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/strangedaysindee00whee/page/11 11β12] |url=https://archive.org/details/strangedaysindee00whee |url-access=registration}}</ref> * [[President of the United States|President]] [[Ronald Reagan]] explained tax law revisions in an address to the nation with the word, May 28, 1985, saying that "most didnβt improve the system; they made it more like Washington itself: Complicated, unfair, cluttered with gobbledygook and loopholes, designed for those with the power and influence to hire high-priced legal and tax advisers."<ref>{{cite web |title=Simpson's contemporary quotations |publisher=Bartleby.com |url=http://www.bartleby.com/63/38/338.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081207025031/http://www.bartleby.com/63/38/338.html |archive-date=7 December 2008 |df=dmy-all}}</ref> * [[Supreme Court of the United States]] justice [[John Roberts]] dismissed quantitative sociological reasoning as "gobbledygook" in 2017, when arguing against using any mathematical test for [[gerrymandering]].<ref>{{cite web |first=Oliver |last=Roeder |date=17 October 2017 |title=The Supreme Court is allergic to math |website=[[FiveThirtyEight]] |url=https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-supreme-court-is-allergic-to-math/ |df=dmy-all}}</ref> * [[Michael Shanks (public official)|Michael Shanks]], former chairman to the [[Consumer Futures|National Consumer Council]] of [[Great Britain]], characterized professional gobbledygook as sloppy jargon intended to confuse nonspecialists: "'Gobbledygook' may indicate a failure to think clearly, a contempt for one's clients, or more probably a mixture of both. A system that can't or won't communicate is not a safe basis for a democracy."<ref>{{cite web |title=Contemporary Quotes |url=http://www.chat11.com/Contemporary_Quotes |date=October 2007 |website=Chat11.com |access-date=4 February 2014 |df=dmy-all |archive-date=23 July 2012 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120723003537/http://www.chat11.com/Contemporary_Quotes |url-status=dead }}</ref>{{Unreliable source?|date=February 2014}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)