Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Go (verb)
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Origin of ''ēode''=== [[Old English]] did not use any variation of ''went'' for the general [[preterite]] of ''go''; instead, the word ''ēode'' (variant ''ġeēode'') was used, which lingered on as the now obsolete ''yede'', ''yode'' and ''yead''.<ref>{{cite book |title=A Concise Etymological Dictionary of the English Language |last=Skeat |first=Walter W. |publisher=Forgotten Books |isbn=978-1-4400-5722-9 |page=193 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wRGhnkZq3HQC&q=eode&pg=PA1933}}</ref> Old English ''ēode'' 'he went' (plural ''ēodon'') is made up of a [[defective verb|defective]] preterite base ''ēo''- and the weak dental suffix -''de'' common in most modern English past tense forms (cf. ''ache'' : ''ached''). The base ''ēo''- and its [[Gothic language|Gothic]] counterpart ''iddja'' (pl. ''iddjedun'') show the following development: * [[Proto-Indo-European|PIE]] [[Proto-Indo-European verbs|perfect]] singular *''{{PIE|ye-yóh₂-}}'' (singular) → Proto-Germanic *''ijō-dē'' → *''eōdæ'' → ''ēode'' * [[Proto-Indo-European|PIE]] perfect plural *''{{PIE|ye-yh₂-}}'' (plural) → *''jejj''- ([[Holtzmann's law]]) → *''jijj-'' ([[i-mutation]]) → Proto-Germanic *''ijjēdun''- → Gothic ''iddjēdun''.<ref>Jens Elmegård Rasmussen, "Germanic Verschärfung: Tying Up Loose Ends", ''Selected Papers on Indo-European Linguistics'' (Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum, 1999), 382.</ref><ref>An alternate derivation has Gothic ''iddja'' ← *''ijjō'' ← PIE *''{{PIE|h₁eh₁yóh₂e}}''; which means OE ''ēo-'' ← PGmc *''ijjō-''; see N. E. Collinge, "Holtzmann's Law", ''The Laws of Indo-European'', (Amsterdam: John Benjamins, [2009], c1985), 96, citing F.O. Lindeman, "Gotisch iddja und altenglisch ēode", ''Indogermanische Forschungen'', 72 (1967), 275-286.</ref> Both forms are derived from the PIE root *''{{PIE|h₁y-éh₂-}}'' (late *''{{PIE|yeh₂-}}'') based on close matches with past tense forms of [[Sanskrit]] ''yā́ti'' 'he goes, travels' (cf. [[imperfect]] ''áyāt'', [[perfect (grammar)|perfect]] ''yayáu'', and [[Sanskrit_verbs#Aorist_system|aorist]] ''áyāsam''). The root is regarded as an iterative-intensive derivative of the more common *''{{PIE|h₁ey-}}'' 'to go' (present *''{{PIE|h₁éyti}}'').<ref>J.P. Mallory & D.Q. Adams, ''Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture'', s.v. "go" (London: Fitzroy Dearborn, 1997), 228.</ref> One reflex of *''{{PIE|h₁ey-}}'' is [[Latin]] ''īre'' 'to go' (present ''eō'' 'I go') which gave many English words such as amb''ition'', ex''it'', intro''it'', issue, preter''ite'', and so forth. It is also found in the [[Slavic languages]] as ''iti'' and similar forms.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)