Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Gustav Fechner
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Elemente der Psychophysik === Fechner's epoch-making work was his ''Elemente der Psychophysik'' (1860). He started from the [[Monism|monistic]] thought that bodily facts and conscious facts, though not reducible one to the other, are different sides of one reality. His originality lies in trying to discover an exact mathematical relation between them. The most famous outcome of his inquiries is the law known as ''Fechner's Law'', which may be expressed as follows:<ref name="EB1911"/> :"In order that the intensity of a sensation may increase in arithmetical progression, the stimulus must increase in geometrical progression." The law has been found to be immensely useful, but to fail for very faint and for very strong sensations. Within its useful range, Fechner's law is that sensation is a logarithmic function of physical intensity. [[Stanley Smith Stevens|S. S. Stevens]] pointed out that such a law does not account for the fact that perceived relationships among stimuli (e.g., papers coloured black, dark grey, grey, light grey, and white) are unchanged with changes in overall intensity (i.e., in the level of illumination of the papers). He proposed, in his famous [[Stevens' power law|1961 paper]] entitled "To Honor Fechner and Repeal His Law", that intensity of stimulation is related to perception via a power-law. Fechner's general formula for getting at the number of units in any sensation is ''S'' = ''c'' log ''R'', where ''S'' stands for the sensation, ''R'' for the stimulus numerically estimated, and ''c'' for a constant that must be separately determined by experiment in each particular order of sensibility. Fechner's reasoning has been criticized on the grounds that although stimuli are composite, sensations are not. "Every sensation," says [[William James]], "presents itself as an indivisible unit; and it is quite impossible to read any clear meaning into the notion that they are masses of units combined."<ref name="EB1911"/>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)