Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Handicapping in Go
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Small board handicaps== Small [[go equipment#Equipment|boards]] are often used for novice players (double-digit kyu players) just learning to play Go, or for quick games. As the fewer moves made when playing on smaller boards gives White fewer chances to overcome the advantage conferred by the handicap, smaller handicaps are used on smaller [[Go equipment#Equipment|Go boards]] (most commonly 13Γ13 and 9Γ9).<ref>See [http://senseis.xmp.net/?HandicapsForSmallerBoardSizes page at Sensei's Library for a fuller discussion]</ref> The per-rank handicap is therefore reduced, by a scaling factor. Various estimates have been given for the factor that applies to 13Γ13, in the range 2.5 up to 4; and on grounds both theoretical and experimental (small-board tournament play). The evidence is that 2.5 is more realistic than 4, for clock games. The corresponding factor for a 9Γ9 board is not easy to understand, and the change for each stone added is very large. One theoretical approach is according to the distribution of the number of moves made in a game on a board of a given size relative to the number made on a 19Γ19 board. Using estimates that a 19Γ19 game will last about 250-300 moves, a 13Γ13 game about 95-120 moves, and a 9Γ9 game about 40-50 moves, a quadratic formula for the ratio of the mean number of plays may apply. Arguing that White catches up by means of Black's 'small errors', so that White's deficit drifts at a constant rate, it makes sense to take the ratio of game lengths as scaling factor.<ref>Psychologically speaking, Black (the pupil) probably sees blunders as more important in a loss; but White (the teacher) is more aware of getting into the game by means of Black's inefficiencies.</ref> Each full stone of handicap on a 13Γ13 board is in any case probably equivalent to about 2.5 to 3 ranks, and each full stone on a 9Γ9 board is equivalent to about 6 ranks. For example, if the appropriate handicap is 9 (i.e., 8.5) stones on a 19Γ19 board, the handicap between those two players is reduced to 4 (because 3.5 Γ 2.5 = 8.75) stones on a 13x13 board and 2 (1.5 Γ 6 = 9) stones on a 9Γ9 board. A 5 (i.e., 4.5) stone handicap on a 9Γ9 board is accordingly equivalent to a handicap of 27 or 28 stones on a 19Γ19 board. These figures are not a consensus, but have wide support. They can be used to give rankings, by converting 13Γ13 handicaps back to rank difference.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)