Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Heterojunction
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Effective mass mismatch == When a heterojunction is formed by two different [[semiconductor]]s, a [[quantum well]] can be fabricated due to difference in [[band structure]]. In order to calculate the static [[energy level]]s within the achieved quantum well, understanding variation or mismatch of the [[Effective mass (solid-state physics)|effective mass]] across the heterojunction becomes substantial. The quantum well defined in the heterojunction can be treated as a finite well potential with width of <math> l_w</math>. In addition, in 1966, Conley et al.<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1103/PhysRev.150.466|title=Electron Tunneling in Metal–Semiconductor Barriers|year=1966|last1=Conley|first1=J.|last2=Duke|first2=C.|last3=Mahan|first3=G.|last4=Tiemann|first4=J.|journal=Physical Review|volume=150|issue=2|pages=466|bibcode = 1966PhRv..150..466C }}</ref> and BenDaniel and Duke<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1103/PhysRev.152.683|title=Space-Charge Effects on Electron Tunneling|year=1966|last1=Bendaniel|first1=D.|last2=Duke|first2=C.|journal=Physical Review|volume=152|issue=2|pages=683|bibcode = 1966PhRv..152..683B }}</ref> reported a [[boundary condition]] for the [[Envelope (mathematics)|envelope function]] in a quantum well, known as BenDaniel–Duke boundary condition. According to them, the envelope function in a fabricated quantum well must satisfy a boundary condition which states that <math> \psi (z) </math> and <math> {\frac {1} {m^*} }{\partial \over {\partial z}} \psi (z) \,</math> are both continuous in interface regions. {{hidden begin|border=solid 1px #aaa|title={{center|Mathematical details worked out for [[quantum well]] example.}}}} Using the [[Schrödinger equation]] for a finite well with width of <math>l_w </math>and center at 0, the equation for the achieved quantum well can be written as: ::<math>-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m_b^*} \frac{\mathrm{d}^2 \psi(z)}{\mathrm{d}z^2} + V \psi(z) = E \psi(z) \quad \quad \text{ for } z < - \frac {l_w}{2} \quad \quad (1)</math> ::<math> \quad \quad -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m_w^*} \frac{\mathrm{d}^2 \psi(z)}{\mathrm{d}z^2} = E \psi(z) \quad \quad \text{ for } - \frac {l_w}{2} < z < + \frac {l_w}{2} \quad \quad (2)</math> ::<math>-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m_b^*} \frac{\mathrm{d}^2 \psi(z)}{\mathrm{d}z^2} + V \psi(z) = E \psi(z) \quad \text{ for } z > + \frac {l_w}{2} \quad \quad (3)</math> Solution for above equations are well-known, only with different(modified) k and <math>\kappa </math> <ref>Griffiths, David J. (2004). ''Introduction to Quantum Mechanics'' (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall. {{ISBN|0-13-111892-7}}</ref> ::<math> k = \frac {\sqrt{2 m_w E}} {\hbar} \quad \quad \kappa = \frac {\sqrt{2 m_b (V-E)}} {\hbar} \quad \quad (4)</math>. At the z = <math> + \frac {l_w} {2} </math> even-parity solution can be gained from ::<Math> A\cos(\frac {k l_w} {2}) = B \exp(- \frac {\kappa l_w} {2}) \quad \quad (5)</math>. By taking derivative of (5) and multiplying both sides by <math> \frac {1} {m^*}</math> ::<Math> -\frac {kA} {m_w^*} \sin(\frac {k l_w} {2}) = -\frac {\kappa B} {m_b^*} \exp(- \frac {\kappa l_w} {2}) \quad \quad (6)</math>. Dividing (6) by (5), even-parity solution function can be obtained, ::<Math> f(E) = -\frac {k} {m_w^*} \tan(\frac {k l_w} {2}) -\frac {\kappa } {m_b^*} = 0 \quad \quad (7)</math>. Similarly, for odd-parity solution, ::<Math> f(E) = -\frac {k} {m_w^*} \cot(\frac {k l_w} {2}) +\frac {\kappa } {m_b^*} = 0 \quad \quad (8)</math>. For [[numerical solution]], taking derivatives of (7) and (8) gives even parity: ::<math> \frac {df}{dE} = \frac {1}{m_w^*} \frac {dk}{dE} \tan(\frac {k l_w} {2}) + \frac {k} {m_w^*} \sec^2(\frac {k l_w} {2}) \times \frac {l_w} {2} \frac {dk} {dE} - \frac {1}{m_b^*} \frac {d \kappa} {dE} \quad \quad (9-1)</math> odd parity: ::<math> \frac {df}{dE} = \frac {1}{m_w^*} \frac {dk}{dE} \cot(\frac {k l_w} {2}) - \frac {k} {m_w^*} \csc^2(\frac {k l_w} {2}) \times \frac {l_w} {2} \frac {dk} {dE} + \frac {1}{m_b^*} \frac {d \kappa} {dE} \quad \quad (9-2)</math> where <math> \frac {dk}{dE} = \frac {\sqrt {2 m_w^*}}{2 \sqrt E \hbar} \quad \quad \quad \frac {d \kappa}{dE} = - \frac {\sqrt {2 m_b^*}}{2 \sqrt {V-E} \hbar}</math>. The difference in effective mass between materials results in a larger difference in [[ground state]] energies. {{hidden end}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)