Editing Hilbert's problems (section)

== Nature and influence of the problems ==
Hilbert's problems ranged greatly in topic and precision.  Some of them, like the 3rd problem, which was the first to be solved, or the 8th problem (the Riemann hypothesis), which still remains unresolved, were presented precisely enough to enable a clear affirmative or negative answer. For other problems, such as the 5th, experts have traditionally agreed on a single interpretation, and a solution to the accepted interpretation has been given, but closely related unsolved problems exist.  Some of Hilbert's statements were not precise enough to specify a particular problem, but were suggestive enough that certain problems of contemporary nature seem to apply; for example, most modern [[number theorists]] would probably see the 9th problem as referring to the [[Conjecture|conjectural]] [[Langlands program|Langlands correspondence]] on representations of the absolute [[Galois group]] of a [[number field]].<ref name="Weinstein">{{cite journal | last=Weinstein | first=Jared | title=Reciprocity laws and Galois representations: recent breakthroughs | journal=Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society | publisher=American Mathematical Society (AMS) | volume=53 | issue=1 | date=2015-08-25 | issn=0273-0979 | doi=10.1090/bull/1515 | pages=1–39| doi-access=free }}</ref>  Still other problems, such as the 11th and the 16th, concern what are now flourishing mathematical subdisciplines, like the theories of [[quadratic form]]s and [[real algebraic curve]]s.

There are two problems that are not only unresolved but may in fact be unresolvable by modern standards. The 6th problem concerns the [[Axiomatic system|axiomatization]] of [[physics]], a goal that 20th-century developments seem to render both more remote and less important than in Hilbert's time.  Also, the 4th problem concerns the [[foundations of geometry]], in a manner that is now generally judged to be too vague to enable a definitive answer.

The 23rd problem was purposefully set as a general indication by Hilbert to highlight the calculus of variations as an underappreciated and understudied field. In the lecture introducing these problems, Hilbert made the following introductory remark to the 23rd problem:

{{Blockquote
|text="So far, I have generally mentioned problems as definite and special as possible, in the opinion that it is just such definite and special problems that attract us the most and from which the most lasting influence is often exerted upon science. Nevertheless, I should like to close with a general problem, namely with the indication of a branch of mathematics repeatedly mentioned in this lecture—which, in spite of the considerable advancement lately given it by Weierstrass, does not receive the general appreciation which, in my opinion, is its due—I mean the calculus of variations."
}}

The other 21 problems have all received significant attention, and late into the 20th century work on these problems was still considered to be of the greatest importance.  [[Paul Cohen]] received the [[Fields Medal]] in 1966 for his work on the first problem, and the negative solution of the tenth problem in 1970 by [[Yuri Matiyasevich]] (completing work by [[Julia Robinson]], [[Hilary Putnam]], and [[Martin Davis (mathematician)|Martin Davis]]) generated similar acclaim. Aspects of these problems are still of great interest today.