Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Imperfective aspect
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Slavic languages== Verbs in [[Slavic languages]] have a perfective and/or an imperfective form. Generally, any of various [[prefix]]es can turn imperfectives into perfectives;<ref> {{cite book | last1 = Bybee | first1 = Joan | author-link1 = Joan Bybee | last2 = Perkins | first2 = Revere | last3 = Pagliuca | first3 = William | chapter = 1: Theoretical Background | title = The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World | chapter-url = https://books.google.com/books?id=aOvU6m-f1IwC | location = Chicago | publisher = University of Chicago Press | date = 1994 | page = 17 | isbn = 9780226086651 | access-date = 2016-08-04 | quote = The Slavic perfective prefixes originally signaled locative notions which made the verb [[telicity|telic]] (just as ''go out'', ''go through'', and ''eat up'' are telic in English). }} </ref> [[suffix]]es can turn perfectives into imperfectives.<ref> {{cite book | last1 = Josephson | first1 = Folke | chapter = Actionality and aspect in Hittite | editor1-last = Josephson | editor1-first = Folke | editor2-last = Söhrman | editor2-first = Ingmar | title = Interdependence of Diachronic and Synchronic Analyses | chapter-url = https://books.google.com/books?id=8ZuTTIhLadgC | series = Studies in language companion series | volume = 103 | location = Amsterdam | publisher = John Benjamins Publishing | date = 2008 | page = 143 | isbn = 9789027205704 | access-date = 2016-08-04 | quote = The imperfective suffix in Slavic languages corresponds to the English progressive (cf. Borer 2005). [...] According to Arsenijevic the meaning of the Slavic imperfective suffix is slightly more general than that of the progressive. }} </ref> The non-past imperfective form is used for the present, while its perfective counterpart is used for the future. There is also a [[periphrastic]] imperfective future construction.<ref name=Dahl>[[Östen Dahl]], 1985. ''Tense and Aspect Systems''. Blackwell.</ref>{{rp|84}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)