Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Inertial frame of reference
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Absolute space=== {{Main|Absolute space and time}} Newton posited an absolute space considered well-approximated by a frame of reference stationary relative to the [[fixed stars]]. An inertial frame was then one in uniform translation relative to absolute space. However, some "relativists",<ref name="Mach">{{Cite book |author=Ernst Mach |url=https://archive.org/details/sciencemechanic01jourgoog |title=The Science of Mechanics |date=1915 |publisher=The Open Court Publishing Co. |page=[https://archive.org/details/sciencemechanic01jourgoog/page/n59 38] |quote=rotating sphere Mach cord OR string OR rod.}}</ref> even at the time of Newton, felt that absolute space was a defect of the formulation, and should be replaced. The expression ''inertial frame of reference'' ({{langx|de|Inertialsystem}}) was coined by [[Ludwig Lange (physicist)|Ludwig Lange]] in 1885, to replace Newton's definitions of "absolute space and time" with a more [[Operational definition#Science|operational definition]]:<ref>{{Cite journal |author=Lange, Ludwig |date=1885 |title=Über die wissenschaftliche Fassung des Galileischen Beharrungsgesetzes |journal=Philosophische Studien |volume=2}}</ref><ref name=Barbour>{{Cite book|author=Julian B. Barbour |title=The Discovery of Dynamics |edition=Reprint of 1989 ''Absolute or Relative Motion?'' |pages=645–646 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WQidkYkleXcC&q=Ludwig+Lange+%22operational+definition%22&pg=PA645 |isbn=0-19-513202-5 |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=2001 }}</ref> {{blockquote|<i>A reference frame in which a mass point thrown from the same point in three different (non co-planar) directions follows rectilinear paths each time it is thrown, is called an inertial frame.</i><ref name=Iro>L. Lange (1885) as quoted by Max von Laue in his book (1921) ''Die Relativitätstheorie'', p. 34, and translated by {{Cite book|page=169 |title=A Modern Approach to Classical Mechanics |author=Harald Iro |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-L5ckgdxA5YC&q=inertial+noninertial&pg=PA179 |isbn=981-238-213-5 |date=2002 |publisher=World Scientific}}</ref>}} The inadequacy of the notion of "absolute space" in Newtonian mechanics is spelled out by Blagojevich:<ref name="Blagojević2">{{Cite book|title=Gravitation and Gauge Symmetries |author=Milutin Blagojević |page=5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=N8JDSi_eNbwC&q=inertial+frame+%22absolute+space%22&pg=PA5 |isbn=0-7503-0767-6 |publisher=CRC Press |date=2002}}</ref> {{blockquote|<i> *The existence of absolute space contradicts the internal logic of classical mechanics since, according to the Galilean principle of relativity, none of the inertial frames can be singled out. *Absolute space does not explain inertial forces since they are related to acceleration with respect to any one of the inertial frames. *Absolute space acts on physical objects by inducing their resistance to acceleration but it cannot be acted upon. </i>| Milutin Blagojević: ''Gravitation and Gauge Symmetries'', p. 5}} The utility of operational definitions was carried much further in the special theory of relativity.<ref name=Woodhouse0>{{Cite book|title=Special relativity |author=NMJ Woodhouse |page=58 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tM9hic_wo3sC&q=Woodhouse+%22operational+definition%22&pg=PA126 |isbn=1-85233-426-6 |publisher=Springer |location=London |date=2003}}</ref> Some historical background including Lange's definition is provided by DiSalle, who says in summary:<ref name=DiSalle>{{Cite book |author =Robert DiSalle |chapter =Space and Time: Inertial Frames |title =The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |editor =Edward N. Zalta |chapter-url =http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2002/entries/spacetime-iframes/#Oth |date =Summer 2002 |publisher =Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date =9 September 2008 |archive-date =7 January 2016 |archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20160107065921/http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2002/entries/spacetime-iframes/#Oth |url-status =live }}</ref> {{blockquote|<i>The original question, "relative to what frame of reference do the laws of motion hold?" is revealed to be wrongly posed. The laws of motion essentially determine a class of reference frames, and (in principle) a procedure for constructing them.</i>|[http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2002/entries/spacetime-iframes/#Oth Robert DiSalle ''Space and Time: Inertial Frames'']}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)