Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Internet privacy
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Internet protocol (IP) addresses=== The architecture of the Internet Protocol necessitates that a website receives [[IP address|IP]] addresses of its visitors, which can be tracked through time. Companies match data over time to associate the name, address, and other information to the IP address.<ref>{{cite web|last=Cyphers|first=Bennett|date=2019-12-02|title=Behind the One-Way Mirror: A Deep Dive Into the Technology of Corporate Surveillance|url=https://www.eff.org/wp/behind-the-one-way-mirror|access-date=2020-03-09|website=Electronic Frontier Foundation|language=en|archive-date=2022-02-13|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220213203447/https://www.eff.org/wp/behind-the-one-way-mirror|url-status=live}}</ref> There are opposing views in different jurisdiction on whether an IP address is personal information. The [[Court of Justice of the European Union]] has ruled they need to be treated as personally identifiable information if the website tracking them, or a third party like a service provider knows the name or street address of the IP address holder, which would be true for static IP addresses, not for dynamic addresses.<ref name="cozen">{{cite web|last=O'Connor|first=Cozen|date=2020-02-14|title=What Is A "Reasonable Link" Under CCPA? {{!}} Lexology|url=https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=6452d1ed-19ae-4fa4-8fb3-119e9735dbea|access-date=2020-03-05|website=www.lexology.com|language=en|archive-date=2022-02-13|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220213203439/https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=6452d1ed-19ae-4fa4-8fb3-119e9735dbea|url-status=live}}</ref> California regulations say IP addresses need to be treated as personal information if the business itself, not a third party, can link them to a name and street address.<ref name="cozen"/><ref>{{cite web|last=Coleman|first=June|date=2020-02-20|title=CCPA Clarity in California|url=https://www.acainternational.org/news/ccpa-clarity-in-california|access-date=2020-03-05|website=ACA International|language=en|archive-date=2022-02-15|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220215223826/https://www.acainternational.org/news/ccpa-clarity-in-california/|url-status=live}}</ref> An Alberta court ruled that police can obtain the IP addresses and the names and addresses associated with them without a search warrant; the Calgary, Alberta police found IP addresses that initiated online crimes. The service provider gave police the names and addresses associated with those IP addresses.<ref>{{Cite news|date=2020-02-11|title=IP Addresses No Longer Protected in Alberta|language=en|work=Canadian Lawyer Magazine|url=https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/news/opinion/ip-addresses-no-longer-protected-in-alberta/326158|access-date=2020-03-05|archive-date=2022-02-15|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220215212915/https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/news/opinion/ip-addresses-no-longer-protected-in-alberta/326158|url-status=live}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)