Editing Kull the Conqueror (section)

==Reception==
The film received mostly negative reviews from critics. On [[Rotten Tomatoes]], the film holds a rating of 25%, based on 20 reviews, with an average rating of 4/10.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/kull_the_conqueror/ |title=Kull the Conqueror (1997) |publisher=[[Rotten Tomatoes]] |access-date=2022-05-04 }}</ref>

Marc Savlov of the [[Austin Chronicle]] gave it 1 out of 5 and wrote that the "fight sequences are a boring blur, and the effects seem to have come straight out of the old Land of the Lost, sans dinosaurs. It's all pretty much of a muddle, and one that neither Sorbo's good looks nor Fierstein's wry wit can save."<ref name="Savlov">{{cite news |date=1997-08-29 |author1=Marc Savlov |title=Movie Review: Kull the Conqueror |url=https://www.austinchronicle.com/events/film/1997-08-29/141835/ |work=[[Austin Chronicle]] }}</ref>
James Berardinelli of ReelViews gave it 1 out of 4. He says it is "a really bad movie" but says there is some "guilty pleasure to be had from watching something this inane". He credits director John Nicolella with making the best of bad material and concludes "It's been a while since I had this much fun at a one-star movie."<ref>{{cite web |date=1997 |author1=James Berardinelli |title=Review: Kull the Conqueror |url=http://www.reelviews.net/movies/k/kull.html |website=Reel Film Reviews |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071012075157/http://www.reelviews.net/movies/k/kull.html |archive-date=2007-10-12 |url-status=dead}}</ref>