Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Liezi
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Authenticity== ''Liezi'' scholars have long recognized that it shares many passages with other pre-Han texts like the ''Zhuangzi'', ''Daodejing'', and ''[[Lüshi Chunqiu]]''. Barrett says opinion is "divided as to whether it is an ancient work with later interpolations or a forgery confected from ancient sources."<ref>{{harvnb|Barrett|1993|p=298}}</ref> On the one hand, the ''Liezi'' could contain a core of c. 400 BCE authentic writings of Lie Yukou; on the other hand, it could be a c. 400 CE compilation forged by Zhang Zhan. The ''Liezi'' is most similar with the ''[[Zhuangzi (book)|Zhuangzi]]''. They share many characters and stories; Graham lists sixteen complete episodes plus sections from others.<ref>{{harvnb|Graham|1990|p=12}}</ref> The ''Zhuangzi'' also mentions Liezi in four chapters and Lie Yukou in three, for example, the famous passage about Liezi's ability to ride the wind and go flying around in chapter 1.<ref>See {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040803151910/http://users.compaqnet.be/cn111132/chuang-tzu/1.htm |title=Watson}}</ref> The final two chapters have heterogeneous contents that differ from the Daoism elsewhere in the book. Chapter 7 records the Yangism philosophy of "Yang Zhu" (Yangzi), infamous for the criticism of [[Mencius]] that he, "believed in 'every man for himself.' If he could have helped the whole world by plucking out a single hair, he would not have done it."<ref>chap. 7A, tr. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927200950/http://www.hm.tyg.jp/~acmuller/contao/mencius.html#div-7A |date=27 September 2007 |title=Muller}}</ref> Zhang Zhan speculates that this chapter, focusing on indulgence in physical and temporary pleasures, was from Lie Yukou's earlier years in Yangism, before he became a Daoist. The well-known scholar of Chinese philosophy, [[Wing-Tsit Chan]] calls the "Yang Zhu" chapter "negative Daoism" in contrast with the Daoism of Laozi, Zhuangzi, and Huainanzi that were "all positive in that each represents something new."<ref>{{harvnb|Chan|1963|p=309}}</ref> Chapter 8, "Explaining Conjunctions," is primarily taken from other early sources, not only Daoist but [[Confucian]] and [[Mohist]] texts, two philosophies that opposed the philosophical Daoism this book expounds. [[A. C. Graham]], Professor Emeritus of the [[School of Oriental and African Studies]], illuminated the textual provenance. After his translation of ''Liezi'' in 1960, which Barrett calls undoubtedly "the best translation into a Western language to date",<ref>{{harvnb|Barrett|1993|p=307}}</ref> Graham linguistically analyzed internal evidence and textual parallels.<ref>{{harvnb|Graham|1961}} {{pages needed|date=July 2023}}</ref> He discovered many cases where the ''Liezi'' is clearly secondary to other texts, but none where it is the primary source for a passage. The Preface to the revised ''Liezi'' translation explains his significant change in attitude. <blockquote>Although in 1960 most scholars in China already recognized the late date of ''[Liezi]'', most Westerners were still disinclined to question its antiquity. My own textual studies, not yet completed when this translation first appeared, supported the Chinese dating, which by now prevails also in the West. … One result of the textual investigation came as a surprise to me. The present book describes the hedonist 'Yang [Zhu]' chapter as 'so unlike the rest of [''Liezi''] that it must be from another hand … The thought is certainly very different, and it does show the signs of editing and interpolation by the Taoist author … But although close scrutiny generally reveals marked differences in style between the body of the book and passages borrowed from earlier sources, I could find none to distinguish the hedonist chapter from the rest.<ref>{{harvnb|Graham|1990|p=xiii}}</ref></blockquote> Owing to occasional ''Liezi'' textual misunderstandings in Zhang Zhan's commentary, Graham concludes that the "guiding hand" probably belonged to Zhang's father or grandfather, which would mean c. 300 CE. Suggestions of Buddhist influences in ''Liezi'' chapters 3 and 6 are potentially corroborating evidence for a late date of composition; see [[Buddhism in China]]. "King Mu of Zhou" discusses sense perceptions as illusions; "Endeavor and Destiny" takes a fatalistic (if not karmic) view of destiny, which goes against the traditional Daoist concept of [[Wu wei|''Wuwei'']].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)