Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Linear span
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Theorems == === Equivalence of definitions === The set of all linear combinations of a subset {{mvar|S}} of {{mvar|V}}, a vector space over {{mvar|K}}, is the smallest linear subspace of {{mvar|V}} containing {{mvar|S}}. :''Proof.'' We first prove that {{math|span ''S''}} is a subspace of {{mvar|V}}. Since {{mvar|S}} is a subset of {{mvar|V}}, we only need to prove the existence of a zero vector {{math|'''0'''}} in {{math|span ''S''}}, that {{math|span ''S''}} is closed under addition, and that {{math|span ''S''}} is closed under scalar multiplication. Letting <math>S = \{ \mathbf v_1, \mathbf v_2, \ldots, \mathbf v_n \}</math>, it is trivial that the zero vector of {{mvar|V}} exists in {{math|span ''S''}}, since <math>\mathbf 0 = 0 \mathbf v_1 + 0 \mathbf v_2 + \cdots + 0 \mathbf v_n</math>. Adding together two linear combinations of {{mvar|S}} also produces a linear combination of {{mvar|S}}: <math>(\lambda_1 \mathbf v_1 + \cdots + \lambda_n \mathbf v_n) + (\mu_1 \mathbf v_1 + \cdots + \mu_n \mathbf v_n) = (\lambda_1 + \mu_1) \mathbf v_1 + \cdots + (\lambda_n + \mu_n) \mathbf v_n</math>, where all <math>\lambda_i, \mu_i \in K</math>, and multiplying a linear combination of {{mvar|S}} by a scalar <math>c \in K</math> will produce another linear combination of {{mvar|S}}: <math>c(\lambda_1 \mathbf v_1 + \cdots + \lambda_n \mathbf v_n) = c\lambda_1 \mathbf v_1 + \cdots + c\lambda_n \mathbf v_n</math>. Thus {{math|span ''S''}} is a subspace of {{mvar|V}}. :It follows that <math>S \subseteq \operatorname{span} S</math>, since every {{math|'''v'''<sub>''i''</sub>}} is a linear combination of {{mvar|S}} (trivially). Suppose that {{mvar|W}} is a linear subspace of {{mvar|V}} containing {{mvar|S}}. Since {{mvar|W}} is closed under addition and scalar multiplication, then every linear combination <math>\lambda_1 \mathbf v_1 + \cdots + \lambda_n \mathbf v_n</math> must be contained in {{mvar|W}}. Thus, {{math|span ''S''}} is contained in every subspace of {{mvar|V}} containing {{mvar|S}}, and the intersection of all such subspaces, or the smallest such subspace, is equal to the set of all linear combinations of {{mvar|S}}. === Size of spanning set is at least size of linearly independent set === Every spanning set {{mvar|S}} of a vector space {{mvar|V}} must contain at least as many elements as any [[Linear independence|linearly independent]] set of vectors from {{mvar|V}}. :''Proof.'' Let <math>S = \{ \mathbf v_1, \ldots, \mathbf v_m \}</math> be a spanning set and <math>W = \{ \mathbf w_1, \ldots, \mathbf w_n \}</math> be a linearly independent set of vectors from {{mvar|V}}. We want to show that <math>m \geq n</math>. :Since {{mvar|S}} spans {{mvar|V}}, then <math>S \cup \{ \mathbf w_1 \}</math> must also span {{mvar|V}}, and <math>\mathbf w_1</math> must be a linear combination of {{mvar|S}}. Thus <math>S \cup \{ \mathbf w_1 \}</math> is linearly dependent, and we can remove one vector from {{mvar|S}} that is a linear combination of the other elements. This vector cannot be any of the {{math|'''w'''<sub>''i''</sub>}}, since {{mvar|W}} is linearly independent. The resulting set is <math>\{ \mathbf w_1, \mathbf v_1, \ldots, \mathbf v_{i-1}, \mathbf v_{i+1}, \ldots, \mathbf v_m \}</math>, which is a spanning set of {{mvar|V}}. We repeat this step {{mvar|n}} times, where the resulting set after the {{mvar|p}}th step is the union of <math>\{ \mathbf w_1, \ldots, \mathbf w_p \}</math> and {{mvar|m - p}} vectors of {{mvar|S}}. :It is ensured until the {{mvar|n}}th step that there will always be some {{math|'''v'''<sub>''i''</sub>}} to remove out of {{mvar|S}} for every adjoint of {{math|'''v'''}}, and thus there are at least as many {{math|'''v'''<sub>''i''</sub>}}'s as there are {{math|'''w'''<sub>''i''</sub>}}'sβi.e. <math>m \geq n</math>. To verify this, we assume by way of contradiction that <math>m < n</math>. Then, at the {{mvar|m}}th step, we have the set <math>\{ \mathbf w_1, \ldots, \mathbf w_m \}</math> and we can adjoin another vector <math>\mathbf w_{m+1}</math>. But, since <math>\{ \mathbf w_1, \ldots, \mathbf w_m \}</math> is a spanning set of {{mvar|V}}, <math>\mathbf w_{m+1}</math> is a linear combination of <math>\{ \mathbf w_1, \ldots, \mathbf w_m \}</math>. This is a contradiction, since {{mvar|W}} is linearly independent. === Spanning set can be reduced to a basis === Let {{mvar|V}} be a finite-dimensional vector space. Any set of vectors that spans {{mvar|V}} can be reduced to a [[Basis (linear algebra)|basis]] for {{mvar|V}}, by discarding vectors if necessary (i.e. if there are linearly dependent vectors in the set). If the [[axiom of choice]] holds, this is true without the assumption that {{mvar|V}} has finite dimension. This also indicates that a basis is a minimal spanning set when {{mvar|V}} is finite-dimensional.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)