Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Log-space reduction
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Logspace reduction == A language <math>L</math> is '''logspace (many-one) reducible''' to another language <math>L'</math>, notated as <math>L \leq_{l} L'</math>, iff there exists an implicitly logspace computable function <math>f</math> such that <math>x \in L \iff f(x) \in L'</math>. This is a transitive relation, because logspace computability is closed under composition, as previously shown. A language <math>L</math> is '''NL-complete''' iff it is NL, and any language in NL is logspace reducible to it. Most naturally-occurring polynomial-time reductions in complexity theory are logspace reductions. In particular, this is true for the standard proof showing that the [[Boolean satisfiability problem|SAT problem]] is [[NP-completeness|NP-complete]], and that the [[Circuit Value Problem|circuit value problem]] is [[P-complete]]. This is also often the case for showing that the [[True quantified Boolean formula]] problem is [[PSPACE-complete]]. This is because the need for memory in such reduction constructions is for counting up to <math>p(n)</math> for some polynomial <math>p</math> in the input length <math>n</math>, and this can be done in logarithmic space.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Garey |first1=Michael R. |title=Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness |last2=Johnson |first2=David S. |date=1979 |publisher=W. H. Freeman |isbn=978-0-7167-1045-5|location=New York |oclc=4195125}}</ref>{{Pg|page=180}} While logspace many-one reduction implies polynomial time many-one reduction, it is unknown whether this is an equivalence, or whether there are problems that are NP-complete under polynomial time reduction, but not under logspace reduction. Any solution to this problem would solve this problem: Are deterministic [[Linear bounded automaton|linear bounded automata]] equivalent to nondeterministic linear bounded automata?<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Lind |first=John |last2=Meyer |first2=Albert R. |date=1973-07-01 |title=A characterization of log-space computable functions |url=https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1008293.1008295 |journal=SIGACT News |volume=5 |issue=3 |pages=26β29 |doi=10.1145/1008293.1008295 |issn=0163-5700}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)