Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Luke Howard
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Scientific work== ===Background=== Luke Howard has been called "the father of meteorology" for his comprehensive recordings of weather in the London area from 1801 to 1841 and his writings, which transformed the science of meteorology.{{sfn|Thornes|1999|p=189}} Howard had an earlier interest in botany, presenting a paper "Account of a Microscopical Investigation of several Species of Pollen, ..." that was published in the [[Linnaean Society]]'s ''Transactions'' for 1802,<ref>Luke Howard. Read 4 March 1800. "[[s:Transactions of the Linnean Society of London/Volume 6/Account of a microscopical investigation of several species of pollen, with remarks and questions on the structure and use of that part of vegetables|Account of a microscopical investigation of several species of pollen, with remarks and questions on the structure and use of that part of vegetables]]" ''Transactions of the Linnean Society of London''. Volume 6</ref> but wrote to [[Goethe]] that his passion was for meteorology.<ref>{{cite DNB|wstitle=Howard, Luke (1772-1864)|first=Thomas |last=Hodgkin|authorlink=Thomas Hodgkin|volume=28}}</ref> ===Howard's ''On the modification of clouds''=== In his late twenties, Luke Howard wrote the ''Essay on the Modification of Clouds'',<ref>{{Cite web |title=On The Modification Of Clouds |url=https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/library-and-archive/archive-hidden-treasures/on-the-modification-of-clouds-1803 |access-date=2024-05-15 |website=Met Office |language=en}}</ref> which was published in 1803.{{sfn|Thornes|1999|p=189}}<ref>{{Cite book |last=Howard |first=Luke |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/essay-on-the-modifications-of-clouds/3EE7DE12FB7D639C7E4658ECBE46A4F3 |title=Essay on the Modifications of Clouds |date=2011 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-108-03768-6 |series=Cambridge Library Collection - Earth Science |location=Cambridge |doi=10.1017/cbo9781139096966}}</ref> Howard's system was similar to the recently popularized [[Linnaean classification]] system developed by taxonomist [[Carl von Linne]].<ref name=Pedgley>{{cite journal |last1=Pedgley |first1=D.E. |title=Luke Howard and his clouds |journal=Weather |date=February 2003 |volume=58 |issue=2 |pages=51–55|doi=10.1256/wea.157.02 |bibcode=2003Wthr...58...51P |s2cid=119944734 }}</ref> Howard named the three principal categories of clouds – [[cumulus cloud|cumulus]], [[stratus cloud|stratus]], and [[Cirrus cloud|cirrus]], as well as a series of intermediate and compound modifications, such as [[cirrostratus]] and [[cirrocumulus]], in order to accommodate the transitions occurring between the forms. Howard's classification system applied the recently popularized [[Linnaean taxonomy|Linnean]] principles of natural history classification. By applying these principles to phenomena as short-lived as clouds, Howard arrived at an elegant solution to the problem of naming transitional forms in nature. In his 1803 ''Essay'', Howard included detailed cloud drawings to supplement the written descriptions of his classifications. The drawings of clouds were Howard's own, taken from the rigorous notes and watercolor sketches in Howard's sketchbook. However, the landscapes were done by painter Edward Kennion, as Howard had no formal artistic training. The engravings done by Thomas Milton for the publishing of Howard's essay slightly altered the depictions of the clouds.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Jardine|first1=Boris|title=Made real: artifice and accuracy in nineteenth-century scientific illustration|journal=Science Museum Group Journal|date=Autumn 2014|volume=2|issue=2|doi=10.15180/140208|doi-access=free}}</ref> [[File:Cumulostratus Etching- Luke Howard.png|thumb|A depiction of a cumulostratus cloud, included in Howard's 'On the modification of clouds']] Howard also emphasized the importance of clouds in meteorology: <blockquote>"Clouds are subject to certain distinct modifications, produced by the general causes which affect all the variations of the atmosphere; they are commonly as good visible indicators of the operation of these causes, as is the countenance of the state of a person's mind or body".{{sfn|Thornes|1999|p=36}}</blockquote> Howard strongly believed that "cloud formation and destruction were visible signs of atmospheric processes and were based on the laws of physics".<ref name=Pedgley/> Howard referred to cloud formation as "nubification", a term that was never popularized. Howard had the same elementary knowledge of cloud physics as many other researchers at the time, including his close friend and chemist [[John Dalton]]. Some of this knowledge was generally correct, like Howard and Dalton's belief that clouds were formations of water particles, that the slow speed of the particles' descension was due to air resistance, and that they evaporated right below the [[cloud base]]. Howard, however, held some incorrect beliefs about cloud physics. Primarily Howard gave electricity too large a role in the formation of clouds. The knowledge Howard had about cloud physics partially formed his motives for creating a classification system.<ref name=Pedgley/> ===Other cloud classification systems=== Howard was not the first to attempt a classification of clouds—biologist [[Jean-Baptiste Lamarck]] (1744–1829) proposed a list of descriptive terms in French the same year that Howard presented his essay, containing five terms, four of which overlapped with Howard's system.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Holt |first1=Jack R. |title=CLOUDS: KEYS TO UNDERSTANDING WEATHER, CLIMATE, AND THE HYDROLOGIC CYCLE |journal=CLOUDS |date=March 2005 |url=https://needoc.net/clouds-keys-to-understanding-weather-climate-and-the-hydrologic-cycle-jack-r-holt |access-date=22 March 2020 |archive-date=21 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200321192552/https://needoc.net/clouds-keys-to-understanding-weather-climate-and-the-hydrologic-cycle-jack-r-holt |url-status=dead }}</ref> The two were not known to have any contact, Lamarck working independently in France, and Howard working independently in England. Despite being presented in the same year, Howard's system gained popularity quickly and became far more widespread than Lamarck's.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Gedzelman |first1=Stanley |title=A Cloud, by any other name |journal=Weatherwise |date=December 2003 |pages=24–28|doi=10.1080/00431670309605401 |s2cid=190689508 }}</ref> Howard's system's success has been said to be due to Howard's use of universal Latin, the Linnaean classification system, and his emphasis on the mutability of clouds. Lamarck's system, however, used French terms and opted for descriptive terms as opposed to a classification system like Linnaeus'. Lamarck's essay proposing his system contained no pictures and was published in an obscure academic journal.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Lamarck |first1=Jean-Baptiste |title=Sur la forme des nuages |journal=Annuaire météorologique |date=1802 |pages=149–164}}</ref> Additionally, [[Napoleon]] publicly denounced Lamarck's meteorological work, and Lamarck's system was never well known within his own country.{{sfn|Hamblyn|2011}} ===Later meteorological work=== In addition to his seminal work on clouds, Howard contributed numerous papers on other meteorological topics. He was also a pioneer in [[urban climate]] studies, publishing the earliest scientific book on urban climatology, ''The Climate of London'' in 1818–20, a 700-page book including continuous daily observations of wind direction, atmospheric pressure, maximum temperature, and rainfall;{{sfn|Thornes|1999|p=203}}<ref name="Day Ludlam">{{cite journal|last1=Day|first1=John A.|last2=Ludlam|first2=Frank H.|title=Luke Howard and His Clouds: A Contribution to the Early History of Cloud Physics|journal=Weather |date=November 1972|volume=27|issue=11|pages=448–461|doi= 10.1002/j.1477-8696.1972.tb04247.x|bibcode=1972Wthr...27..448D}}</ref> it also demolished [[James Hutton]]'s theory of rain, though without suggesting a definitive alternative.{{sfn|Thornes|1999|p=190}} In it, Howard was first to note the [[urban heat island]] effect, showing that temperatures in London, compared to those simultaneously measured in the surrounding countryside, were 3.7 °F (2.1 °C) warmer at night, and cooler during the day, and to attribute the concentration of smog (which he called 'city fog') to this phenomenon.<ref>Landsberg, Helmut Erich (1981). The urban climate. Academic Press, New York, p.3.</ref> For ''[[Rees's Cyclopædia]]'' he contributed articles on meteorology, but the titles are not known. Luke Howard also published the first textbook in meteorology in 1837, ''Seven Lectures in Meteorology''. In the fifth lecture, Howard included the same classification scheme he proposed in 1802, slightly changing his descriptions. Howard notes again the importance of cloud studies for meteorology in the introduction of his work, claiming clouds to be "the subjects of grave theory and practical research...shewn to be governed, in their production, suspension, and destruction, by... fixed Laws".<ref name="Day Ludlam"/>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)