Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Mass driver
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Spacecraft-based mass drivers== A [[spacecraft]] could carry a mass driver as its primary engine. With a suitable source of electrical power (probably a [[nuclear reactor]]) the spaceship could then use the mass driver to accelerate pieces of matter of almost any sort, boosting itself in the opposite direction. At the smallest scale of reaction mass, this type of drive is called an [[ion drive]].{{Citation needed|date=March 2021}} No absolute theoretical limit is known for the size, acceleration or muzzle energy of linear motors. However, practical engineering constraints apply for such as the power-to-mass ratio, [[waste heat]] dissipation, and the energy intake able to be supplied and handled. Exhaust velocity is best neither too low nor too high.<ref name = neofuel>{{cite web|url=http://www.neofuel.com/optimum/|title=Physics of Rocket Systems with Separated Energy and Propellant}}</ref> There is a mission-dependent limited optimal exhaust velocity and [[Specific Impulse#Rockets|specific impulse]] for any thruster constrained by a limited amount of onboard spacecraft power. Thrust and momentum from exhaust, per unit mass expelled, scales up linearly with its velocity ([[momentum]] = mv), yet kinetic energy and energy input requirements scale up faster with velocity squared ([[kinetic energy]] = {{frac||1|2}} mv<sup>2</sup>). Too low an exhaust velocity would excessively increase propellant mass needed under the [[rocket equation]], with too high a fraction of energy going into accelerating propellant not used yet. Higher exhaust velocity has both benefit and tradeoff, increasing propellant usage efficiency (more momentum per unit mass of propellant expelled) but decreasing thrust and the current rate of spacecraft acceleration if available input power is constant (less momentum per unit of energy given to propellant).<ref name = neofuel/> [[Electrically powered spacecraft propulsion|Electric propulsion]] methods like mass drivers are systems where energy does not come from the propellant itself. (This contrasts with [[chemical rocket]]s where [[propulsive efficiency]] varies with the ratio of exhaust velocity to vehicle velocity at the time, but near maximum obtainable specific impulse tends to be a design goal when corresponding to the most energy released from reacting propellants). Although the specific impulse of an electric thruster itself optionally could range up to where mass drivers merge into [[particle accelerator]]s with fractional-lightspeed exhaust velocity for tiny particles, trying to use extreme exhaust velocity to accelerate a far slower spacecraft could be suboptimally low thrust when the energy available from a spacecraft's reactor or power source is limited (a lesser analogue of feeding onboard power to a row of spotlights, photons being an example of an extremely low momentum to energy ratio).<ref name = neofuel/> For instance, if limited onboard power fed to its engine was the dominant limitation on how much payload a hypothetical spacecraft could shuttle (such as if intrinsic propellant economic cost was minor from usage of extraterrestrial soil or ice), ideal exhaust velocity would rather be around 62.75% of total mission [[delta-v|delta v]] if operating at constant specific impulse, except greater optimization could come from [[Specific Impulse#Rockets|varying exhaust velocity]] during the mission profile (as possible with some thruster types, including mass drivers and [[VASIMR|variable specific impulse magnetoplasma rockets]]).<ref name = neofuel/> Since a mass driver could use any type of mass for reaction mass to move the spacecraft, a mass driver or some variation seems ideal for deep-space vehicles that scavenge reaction mass from found resources. One possible drawback of the mass driver is that it has the potential to send solid reaction mass travelling at dangerously high relative speeds into useful orbits and traffic lanes. To overcome this problem, most schemes plan to throw finely-divided [[dust]]. Alternatively, liquid oxygen could be used as reaction mass, which upon release would boil down to its molecular state. Propelling the reaction mass to solar [[escape velocity]] is another way to ensure that it will not remain a hazard.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)