Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Maximal and minimal elements
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Greatest and least elements == {{main article|Greatest and least elements}} For a partially ordered set <math>(P, \leq),</math> the [[irreflexive kernel]] of <math>\,\leq\,</math> is denoted as <math>\,<\,</math> and is defined by <math>x < y</math> if <math>x \leq y</math> and <math>x \neq y.</math> For arbitrary members <math>x, y \in P,</math> exactly one of the following cases applies: #<math>x < y</math>; #<math>x = y</math>; #<math>y < x</math>; #<math>x</math> and <math>y</math> are incomparable. Given a subset <math>S \subseteq P</math> and some <math>x \in S,</math> * if case 1 never applies for any <math>y \in S,</math> then <math>x</math> is a maximal element of <math>S,</math> as defined above; * if case 1 and 4 never applies for any <math>y \in S,</math> then <math>x</math> is called a {{em|[[greatest element]]}} of <math>S.</math> Thus the definition of a greatest element is stronger than that of a maximal element. Equivalently, a greatest element of a subset <math>S</math> can be defined as an element of <math>S</math> that is greater than every other element of <math>S.</math> A subset may have at most one greatest element.<ref group=proof>If <math>g_1</math> and <math>g_2</math> are both greatest, then <math>g_1 \leq g_2</math> and <math>g_2 \leq g_1,</math> and hence <math>g_1 = g_2</math> by [[antisymmetry]]. <math>\blacksquare</math></ref> The greatest element of <math>S,</math> if it exists, is also a maximal element of <math>S,</math><ref group=proof>If <math>g</math> is the greatest element of <math>S</math> and <math>s \in S,</math> then <math>s \leq g.</math> By [[antisymmetry]], this renders (<math>g \leq s</math> and <math>g \neq s</math>) impossible. <math>\blacksquare</math></ref> and the only one.<ref group=proof>If <math>m</math> is a maximal element then <math>m \leq g</math> (because <math>g</math> is greatest) and thus <math>m = g</math> since <math>m</math> is maximal. <math>\blacksquare</math></ref> By [[contraposition]], if <math>S</math> has several maximal elements, it cannot have a greatest element; see example 3. If <math>P</math> satisfies the [[ascending chain condition]], a subset <math>S</math> of <math>P</math> has a greatest element [[if, and only if]], it has one maximal element.<ref group=proof>{{em|Only if}}: see above. — {{em|If}}: Assume for contradiction that <math>S</math> has just one maximal element, <math>m,</math> but no greatest element. Since <math>m</math> is not greatest, some <math>s_1 \in S</math> must exist that is incomparable to <math>m.</math> Hence <math>s_1 \in S</math> cannot be maximal, that is, <math>s_1 < s_2</math> must hold for some <math>s_2 \in S.</math> The latter must be incomparable to <math>m,</math> too, since <math>m < s_2</math> contradicts <math>m</math>'s maximality while <math>s_2 \leq m</math> contradicts the incomparability of <math>m</math> and <math>s_1.</math> Repeating this argument, an infinite ascending chain <math>s_1 < s_2 < \ldots < s_n < \cdots</math> can be found (such that each <math>s_i</math> is incomparable to <math>m</math> and not maximal). This contradicts the ascending chain condition. <math>\blacksquare</math></ref> When the restriction of <math>\,\leq\,</math> to <math>S</math> is a [[total order]] (<math>S = \{ 1, 2, 4 \}</math> in the topmost picture is an example), then the notions of maximal element and greatest element coincide.<ref group=proof>Let <math>m \in S</math> be a maximal element, for any <math>s \in S</math> either <math>s \leq m</math> or <math>m \leq s.</math> In the second case, the definition of maximal element requires that <math>s = m,</math> so it follows that <math>s \leq m.</math> In other words, <math>m</math> is a greatest element. <math>\blacksquare</math></ref> This is not a necessary condition: whenever <math>S</math> has a greatest element, the notions coincide, too, as stated above. If the notions of maximal element and greatest element coincide on every two-element subset <math>S</math> of <math>P.</math> then <math>\,\leq\,</math> is a total order on <math>P.</math><ref group=proof>If <math>a, b \in P</math> were incomparable, then <math>S = \{ a, b \}</math> would have two maximal, but no greatest element, contradicting the coincidence. <math>\blacksquare</math></ref> Dual to ''greatest'' is the notion of ''least element'' that relates to ''minimal'' in the same way as ''greatest'' to ''maximal''.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)