Editing Mufti (section)

==In pre-modern Islam==

===Mufti's activity (''iftāʾ'')===

[[File:Ein_Mufti,_oder_Türkischer_Pfaff.tif|thumbnail|upright=0.8|Turkish mufti (1687 engraving)]]

The legal theory of the ''ifta'' was formulated in the classical texts of ''[[usul al-fiqh]]'' (principles of jurisprudence), while more practical guidelines for muftis were found in manuals called ''adab al-mufti'' or ''adab al-fatwa'' (etiquette of the mufti/fatwa).{{sfn|Messick|2017}}

A mufti's fatwa is issued in response to a query.{{sfn|Berger|2014}} Fatwas can range from a simple yes/no answer to a book-length treatise.{{sfn|Hendrickson|2013}}{{sfn|Dallal|Hendrickson|2009}} A short fatwa may state a well-known point of law in response to a question from a lay person, while a "major" fatwa may give a judgment on an unprecedented case, detailing the legal reasoning behind the decision.{{sfn|Hendrickson|2013}}{{sfn|Dallal|Hendrickson|2009}} Queries to muftis were supposed to address real and not hypothetical situations and be formulated in general terms, leaving out names of places and people. Since a mufti was not supposed to inquire into the situation beyond the information included in the query, queries regarding contentious matters were often carefully constructed to elicit the desired response.{{sfn|Messick|Kéchichian|2009}} A mufti's understanding of the query commonly depended on their grasp of local customs and colloquial expressions. In theory, if the query was unclear or not sufficiently detailed for a ruling, the mufti was supposed to state these caveats in their response.{{sfn|Messick|Kéchichian|2009}} Muftis often consulted another mufti on difficult cases, though this practice was not foreseen by legal theory, which saw ''futya'' as a transaction between one qualified jurist and one "unqualified" petitioner.{{sfn|Vikør|2005|p=147}}

In theory, a mufti was expected to issue fatwas free of charge. In practice, muftis commonly received support from the public treasury, public endowments or private donations. Taking of bribes was forbidden.{{sfn|Powers|2017}}{{sfn|Messick|Kéchichian|2009}} Until the 11th or 12th century, the vast majority of jurists held other jobs to support themselves. These were generally lower- and middle-class professions such as tanning, manuscript copying or small trade.{{sfn|Hallaq|2009|p=13}}

===Role of muftis===

The classical institution of ''ifta'' is similar to ''jus respondendi'' in [[Roman law]] and the ''[[responsa]]'' in [[Jewish law]].{{sfn|Messick|Kéchichian|2009}}{{sfn|Tyan|Walsh|2012}}

Muftis have played three important roles in the classical legal system:
* managing information about Islam by providing legal advice to Muslim populations as well as counseling them in matters of ritual and ethics;{{sfn|Masud|Kéchichian|2009}}{{sfn|Messick|Kéchichian|2009}}
* advising courts of law on finer points of Islamic law, in response to queries from judges;{{sfn|Masud|Kéchichian|2009}}{{sfn|Dallal|Hendrickson|2009}}
* elaborating substantive Islamic law, particularly though a genre of legal literature developed by author-jurists who collected fatwas of prominent muftis and integrated them into books.{{sfn|Masud|Kéchichian|2009}}{{sfn|Messick|Kéchichian|2009}}

[[File:Atai (Walters MS 666) - A Juriconsult Giving Sexual Advice (cropped).jpg|thumb|upright=1.5|A mufti gives sexual advice in response to a woman's complaint about her son-in-law's inability to consummate his marriage to her daughter. Ottoman manuscript, 1721.]]

Islamic doctrine regards the practice of ''ifta'' as a collective obligation (''[[Fard al-kifaya|farḍ al-kifāya]]''), which must be discharged by some members of the community.{{sfn|Swartz|2009}} Before the rise of modern schools, the study of law was a centerpiece of advanced education in the Islamic world. A relatively small class of legal scholars controlled the interpretation of sharia on a wide range of questions essential to the society, ranging from ritual to finance. It was considered a requirement for qualified jurists to communicate their knowledge through teaching or issuing fatwas. The ideal mufti was conceived as an individual of scholarly accomplishments and exemplary morals, and muftis were generally approached with the respect and deference corresponding to these expectations.{{sfn|Messick|Kéchichian|2009}}

Judges generally sought an opinion from a mufti with higher scholarly authority than themselves for difficult cases or potentially controversial verdicts.{{sfn|Hendrickson|2013}}{{sfn|Vikør|2005|p=143}} Fatwas were routinely upheld in courts, and if a fatwa was disregarded, it was usually because another fatwa supporting a different position was judged to be more convincing. If a party in a dispute was not able to obtain a fatwa supporting their position, they would be unlikely to pursue their case in court, opting for informal mediation instead, or abandoning their claim altogether.{{sfn|Hallaq|2009|pp=9–11}} Sometimes muftis could be petitioned for a fatwa relating to a court judgement that has already been passed, acting as an informal appeals process, but the extent of this practice and its mechanism varied across history.{{sfn|Vikør|2005|p=144}} While in most of the Islamic world judges were not required to consult muftis by any political authority, in [[Al-Andalus|Muslim Spain]] this practice was mandatory, so that a judicial decision was considered invalid without prior approval by a legal specialist.{{sfn|Hallaq|2010|p=159}}

Author-jurists collected fatwas by muftis of high scholarly reputation and abstracted them into concise formulations of legal norms for the benefit of judges, giving a summary of jurisprudence for a particular ''[[madhhab]]'' (legal school).{{sfn|Masud|Kéchichian|2009}}{{sfn|Hallaq|2009|pp=9–11}} Author-jurists sought out fatwas that reflected the social conditions of their time and place, often opting for later legal opinions which were at variance with the doctrine of early authorities.{{sfn|Hallaq|2009|pp=9–11}} Research by [[Wael Hallaq]] and Baber Johansen has shown that the rulings of muftis collected in these volumes could, and sometimes did, have a significant impact on the development of Islamic law.{{sfn|Swartz|2009}}

During the early centuries of Islam, the roles of mufti, author-jurist and judge were not mutually exclusive. A jurist could lead a teaching circle, conduct a fatwa session, and adjudicate court cases in a single day, devoting his night hours to writing a legal treatise. Those who were able to act in all four capacities were regarded as the most accomplished jurists.{{sfn|Hallaq|2009|p=13}}

===Qualifications of a mufti===

[[File:Mufti.png|thumbnail|upright=0.8|Algerian mufti, British drawing (1817)]]

The basic prerequisite for issuing fatwas under the classical legal theory was religious knowledge and piety. According to the ''adab al-mufti'' manuals, a mufti must be an adult, Muslim, trusted and reliable, of good character and sound mind, an alert and rigorous thinker, trained as a jurist, and not a sinner.{{sfn|Powers|2017}} On a practical level, the stature of muftis derived from their reputation for scholarly expertise and upright character.{{sfn|Hendrickson|2013}} Issuing of fatwas was among the most demanding occupations in medieval Islam and muftis were among the best educated religious scholars of their time.{{sfn|Swartz|2009}}

According to legal theory, it was up to each mufti to decide when he was ready to practice. In practice, an aspiring jurist would normally study for several years with one or several recognized scholars, following a curriculum that included [[Arabic grammar]], [[hadith]], law and other [[Islamic sciences|religious sciences]]. The teacher would decide when the student was ready to issue fatwas by giving him a certificate (''[[ijaza]]'').{{sfn|Vikør|2005|p=144}}

During the first centuries of Islam, it was assumed that a mufti was a ''[[mujtahid]]'', i.e., a jurist who is capable of deriving legal rulings directly from the scriptural sources through independent reasoning (''[[ijtihad]]''), evaluating the reliability of hadith and applying or even developing the appropriate legal methodologies. Starting from around 1200 CE, legal theorists began to accept that muftis of their time may not possess the knowledge and legal skill to perform this activity. In addition, it was felt that the major question of jurisprudence had already been addressed by master jurists of earlier times, so that later muftis only had to follow the legal opinions established within their [[Madhhab|legal school]] (''[[taqlid]]''). At that point, the notions of ''mufti'' and ''mujtahid'' became distinguished, and legal theorists classified jurists into three or more levels of competence.{{sfn|Vikør|2005|pp=152–154}}

Unlike the post of ''[[qadi]]'', which is reserved for men in the classical sharia system, fatwas could be issued by qualified women as well as men.{{sfn|Tyan|Walsh|2012}} In practice, the vast majority of jurists who completed the lengthy curriculum in linguistic and religious sciences required to obtain the qualification to issue fatwas were men.{{sfn|Hendrickson|2013}} Slaves and persons who were blind or mute were likewise theoretically barred from the post of a judge, but not that of mufti.{{sfn|Powers|2017}}

===Mufti vs. judge===

The mufti and the judge play different roles in the classical sharia system, with corresponding differences between a fatwa and a ''qada'' (court decision):

* A fatwa is nonbinding, while a court decision is binding and enforceable.{{sfn|Hendrickson|2013}}{{sfn|Masud|Kéchichian|2009}}
* A fatwa may deal with rituals, ethical questions, religious doctrines and sometimes even philosophical issues, while court cases dealt with legal matters in the narrow sense.{{sfn|Masud|Kéchichian|2009}}{{sfn|Hendrickson|2013}}
* The authority of a court judgment applies only to the specific court case, while a fatwa applies to all cases that fit the premises of the query.{{sfn|Messick|Kéchichian|2009}}
* A fatwa is made on the basis of information provided in the request, while a judge actively investigates the facts of the case.{{sfn|Hendrickson|2013}}{{sfn|Messick|Kéchichian|2009}}
* A judge evaluates rival claims of two parties in a dispute in order to reach a verdict, while a fatwa is made on the basis of information provided by a single petitioner.{{sfn|Hendrickson|2013}}{{sfn|Messick|Kéchichian|2009}}
* Fatwas by prominent jurists were collected in books as sources of precedent, while court decisions were entered into court registers, but not otherwise disseminated.{{sfn|Hendrickson|2013}}{{sfn|Messick|Kéchichian|2009}}
* While both muftis and judges were interpreters of sharia, judicial interpretation centered on evaluating evidence such as testimony and oath, while a mufti investigated textual sources of law (scripture and legal literature).{{sfn|Messick|Kéchichian|2009}}
* In the classical legal system, judges were civil servants appointed by the ruler, while muftis were private scholars and not appointed officials.{{sfn|Berger|2014}}

===Institutions===

[[File:Samarkand, Registan, Ulugbek Medressa (6238565020).jpg|thumb|[[Ulugh Beg Madrasa, Samarkand]] (est. 1422)]]

Before the 11th century CE, anyone who possessed scholarly recognition as an Islamic jurist could issue fatwas. Starting around that time, however, the public office of mufti began to appear alongside the private issuing of fatwas. In [[Khurasan]], the rulers appointed a head of the local ulama, called ''[[shaykh al-Islam]]'', who also functioned as the chief mufti. The [[Mamluk Sultanate (Cairo)|Mamluks]] appointed four muftis, one for each of the four Sunni madhhabs, to the appeals courts of provincial capitals. The Ottomans organized muftis into a hierarchical bureaucracy with a chief mufti of the empire called ''shaykh al-islam'' at the top. The Ottoman ''shaykh al-Islam'' (Turkish: ''şeyhülislam''), was among the most powerful state officials.{{sfn|Messick|Kéchichian|2009}} Scribes reviewed queries directed to Ottoman muftis and rewrote them to facilitate issuing of fatwas.{{sfn|Messick|Kéchichian|2009}}{{sfn|Dallal|Hendrickson|2009}} In [[Mughal India]] and [[Safavid Iran]] the chief mufti had the title of ''sadr''.{{sfn|Dallal|Hendrickson|2009}}

For the first few centuries of Islam, muftis were educated in informal study circles, but beginning in the 11th and 12th centuries, the ruling elites began to establish institutions of higher religious learning known as [[madrasa]]s in an effort to secure support and cooperation of the ''[[ulema]]'' (religious scholars). Madrasas, which were primarily devoted to the study of law, soon multiplied throughout the Islamic world, helping to spread Islamic learning beyond urban centers and to unite diverse Islamic communities in a shared cultural project.{{sfn|Berkey|2004}}

In some states, such as Muslim Spain, muftis were assigned to courts in advisory roles. In Muslim Spain jurists also sat on a ''[[shura]]'' (council) advising the ruler. Muftis were additionally appointed to other public functions, such as [[Muhtasib|market inspectors]].{{sfn|Masud|Kéchichian|2009}}

==== In Shia Islam ====

While the office of the mufti was gradually subsumed into the state bureaucracy in much of the Sunni Muslim world, [[Shia]] religious establishment followed a different path in Iran starting from the early modern era. During [[Safavid]] rule, independent Islamic jurists (''[[mujtahid]]s'') claimed the authority to represent the [[Muhammad al-Mahdi|hidden imam]]. Under the ''[[usuli]]'' doctrine that prevailed among [[Twelver Shia]]s in the 18th century and under the [[Qajar]] dynasty, the ''mujtahids'' further claimed to act collectively as deputies of the [[imam]]. According to this doctrine, all Muslims are supposed to follow a high-ranking living ''mujtahid'' bearing the title of ''[[Marja'|marja' al-taqlid]]'', whose fatwas are considered binding, unlike fatwas in Sunni Islam. Thus, in contrast to Sunni muftis, Shia ''mujtahids'' gradually achieved increasing independence from the state.{{sfn|Dallal|Hendrickson|2009}}

===Public and political fatwas===

While most fatwas were delivered to an individual or a judge, some fatwas that were public or political in nature played an important role in religious legitimation, doctrinal disputes, political criticism, or political mobilization. As muftis were progressively incorporated into government bureaucracies in the course of Islamic history, they were often expected to support government policies. Ottoman sultans regularly sought fatwas from the chief mufti for administrative and military initiatives, including fatwas sanctioning [[jihad]] against [[Mamluk Sultanate (Cairo)|Mamluk Egypt]] and [[Safavid]] Iran.{{sfn|Hendrickson|2013}} Fatwas by the Ottoman chief mufti were also solicited by the rulers to legitimize new social and economic practices, such as financial and penal laws enacted outside of sharia, printing of nonreligious books (1727) and vaccination (1845).{{sfn|Dallal|Hendrickson|2009}}

At other times muftis wielded their influence independently of the ruler, and several Ottoman and Moroccan sultans were deposed by a fatwa.{{sfn|Hendrickson|2013}} This happened, for example, to the Ottoman sultan [[Murad V]] on the grounds of his insanity.{{sfn|Dallal|Hendrickson|2009}} Public fatwas were also used to dispute doctrinal matters, and in some case to proclaim that certain groups or individuals who professed to be Muslim were to be excluded from the [[Ummah|Islamic community]] (a practice known as ''[[takfir]]'').{{sfn|Hendrickson|2013}} In both political and scholarly sphere, doctrinal controversies between different states, denominations or centers of learning were accompanied by dueling fatwas.{{sfn|Messick|Kéchichian|2009}} Muftis also acted to counteract the influence of judges and secular functionaries. By articulating grievances and legal rights of the population, public fatwas often prompted an otherwise unresponsive court system to provide redress.{{sfn|Dallal|Hendrickson|2009}}