Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
NLAW
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Development === Research for a new Swedish light [[anti-tank guided missile]] began in the 1990s by the [[Swedish Armed Forces]], for its [[mechanized infantry]] which were lacking both tanks and [[anti-tank warfare]] weapons. Initially, the project focused on creating as simple and cost-effective a system as possible; after some analysis, the need for a man-portable anti-tank weapon with great effectiveness at short to mid-range emerged.<ref name= "Försvarsmakten2011">{{Cite book |title=Skjutreglemente: Pansarvärnsrobot 57 |publisher= [[Swedish Armed Forces]] |publication-place=Stockholm, [[Sweden|SE]] |publication-date= 2011 |page=7 |language= sv |trans-title= Shooting regulation: Anti-tank missile 57 |id=Libris ID: 12279733}}</ref> In October 1999, the British DPA awarded Bofors (later Saab Bofors Dynamics) with a product definition order to procure a weapon prototype within 22 months, corresponding to the requirements of the British NLAW-programme:<ref name="2008 Project Summary Audit"/> To be able to hit a moving target at {{convert |400|m|ft|abbr= on}} and a stationary target at {{convert|600|m|ft|abbr=on}}, with a maximum weight of {{convert |12.5|kg|abbr= on}};<ref name="FMV Aktuellt 2001"/> some of the requirements later made by the Swedish FMV were a lowered [[backblast area]], a minimum effective range of 20 metres, and an environmental adaptation for international operations.<ref name= "PROTEC 2006"/> Saab Bofors Dynamics, the DPA, and the FMV each paid a third of the assessment-phase cost for the MBT LAW,<ref name="FMV Aktuellt 2001"/> of £18 million.<ref name= "Think Defence"/> The FMV invested additional money during the NLAW-trials, while the DPA ceased further funding until a contract was signed.<ref name= "FMV Aktuellt 2001"/> The project gained momentum in 2002–2003 after being selected by the British and Swedish defence authorities,<ref name="Think Defence"/><ref name= "Försvarsmakten2011"/> meeting the demanding requirements from both nations.<ref name= "Saab Bofors Dynamics">{{Cite web |title= NLAW: Next generation Light Anti-tank Weapon |url= https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/50782943/nlaw-brochure-saab |url-status=live |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20220323142333/https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/50782943/nlaw-brochure-saab |archive-date= 23 March 2022 |access-date=22 March 2022 |publisher=[[Saab Bofors Dynamics]] |publication-place= Karlskoga, [[Sweden|SE]] |via= Yumpu}}</ref><ref name= "FMV Aktuellt 2002"/> Both launcher and missile development was done by Saab Bofors Dynamics in [[Eskilstuna]] and [[Karlskoga]], Sweden, using technology derived from earlier Bofors systems; such as the [[RBS 56B BILL 2]] (warhead and guidance) and AT4 CS (confined space capability),<ref name="Saab May Contract"/> as well as some further developments.<ref name= "FMV Aktuellt 2001"/> The United Kingdom and Sweden shared the development costs.<ref name= "PROTEC 2008">{{Cite magazine |last=Af Sandeberg |first=Jane |date= 2008 |title=Koordination med ambitioner |url= https://www.aef.se/Flygvapnet/Tidskrifter/Protec/Protec01_08.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20210405173032/https://www.aef.se/Flygvapnet/Tidskrifter/Protec/Protec01_08.pdf |archive-date=5 April 2021 |access-date=14 April 2022 |magazine= Protec |page= 13 |language=sv |trans-title= Coordination with ambitions |publisher=[[Swedish Defence Materiel Administration|Försvarets materielverk]] |publication-place= [[Stockholm]]}}</ref> Full production and delivery was expected to begin by the end of 2006, with the development phase "nearing its end" in 2005 according to Nick Moore (DPA).<ref name= "PROTEC 2005"/> However, as a result of qualification failures in the tests of November 2006,<ref name= "2008 Project Summary Audit"/> it was delayed until 2008.<ref name= "NLAW Product Update"/><ref name="Armed Forces"/> Due to the similar requirements made by the Swedish and British defence authorities, the weapon comes with only minor differences in appearance.<ref name= "PROTEC 2005">{{Cite magazine |last= Forsberg |first= Magnus |date= May 2005 |title= Två länder ett vapen |url= https://www.aef.se/Flygvapnet/Tidskrifter/Protec/Protec03_05.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20210405171057/https://www.aef.se/Flygvapnet/Tidskrifter/Protec/Protec03_05.pdf |archive-date=5 April 2021 |access-date=14 April 2022 |magazine=Protec |pages= 18–19 |language=sv |trans-title= Two countries, one weapon |publisher= [[Swedish Defence Materiel Administration|Försvarets materielverk]] |publication-place= [[Stockholm]]}}</ref> It uses a single [[Shaped charge|shaped-charge]] warhead, as opposed to other comparable missiles that have a [[tandem warhead]].<ref name= "Saab NLAW"/> Saab, who also develops the system software, announced in 2015 that they had been able to optimise the guidance system by fine-tuning its ''predicted line of sight''. An effective range of {{convert |800|m|ft|abbr=on}} and up against stationary targets was demonstrated in April 2014.<ref name= "NLAW Product Update"/><ref name= "Think Defence"/> An effective range of {{convert |600|m|ft|abbr=on}} against moving targets has also been reported.<ref name= "Weaponews"/>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)