Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
No-cloning theorem
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Generalization == In the statement of the theorem, two assumptions were made: the state to be copied is a [[pure state]] and the proposed copier acts via unitary time evolution. These assumptions cause no loss of generality. If the state to be copied is a [[mixed state (physics)|mixed state]], it can be [[purification of quantum state|"purified]]," i.e. treated as a pure state of a larger system. Alternately, a different proof can be given that works directly with mixed states; in this case, the theorem is often known as the no-broadcast theorem.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Barnum|first1=Howard|last2=Caves|first2=Carlton M.|last3=Fuchs|first3=Christopher A.|last4=Jozsa|first4=Richard|last5=Schumacher|first5=Benjamin|date=1996-04-08|title=Noncommuting Mixed States Cannot Be Broadcast|journal=Physical Review Letters|volume=76|issue=15|pages=2818β2821|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.2818|pmid=10060796|arxiv=quant-ph/9511010|bibcode=1996PhRvL..76.2818B|s2cid=11724387}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Kalev|first1=Amir|last2=Hen|first2=Itay|date=2008-05-29|title=No-Broadcasting Theorem and Its Classical Counterpart|journal=Physical Review Letters|volume=100|issue=21|pages=210502|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.210502|pmid=18518590|arxiv=0704.1754|bibcode=2008PhRvL.100u0502K|s2cid=40349990}}</ref> Similarly, an arbitrary [[quantum operation]] can be implemented via introducing an [[Ancilla bit|ancilla]] and performing a suitable unitary evolution.{{clarify|reason=What other quantum operations are there? The phrasing of the proof in the previous section contains the implicit claim that we had them all when we had unitary ones and Hermitian ones. Now there are more? These new operations should be spelled out. The linked article is a grab bag.|date=May 2015}} Thus the no-cloning theorem holds in full generality.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)