Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Non-measurable set
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Consistent definitions of measure and probability== The [[Banach–Tarski paradox]] shows that there is no way to define volume in three dimensions unless one of the following five concessions is made:{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} # The volume of a set might change when it is rotated. # The volume of the union of two disjoint sets might be different from the sum of their volumes. # Some sets might be tagged "non-measurable", and one would need to check whether a set is "measurable" before talking about its volume. # The axioms of ZFC ([[Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory]] with the axiom of choice) might have to be altered. # The volume of <math>[0,1]^3</math> is <math>0</math> or <math>\infty</math>. Standard measure theory takes the third option. One defines a family of measurable sets, which is very rich, and almost any set explicitly defined in most branches of mathematics will be among this family.{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} It is usually very easy to prove that a given specific subset of the geometric plane is measurable.{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} The fundamental assumption is that a countably infinite sequence of disjoint sets satisfies the sum formula, a property called [[sigma additivity|σ-additivity]]. In 1970, [[Robert M. Solovay|Solovay]] demonstrated that the existence of a non-measurable set for the [[Lebesgue measure]] is not provable within the framework of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory in the absence of an additional axiom (such as the axiom of choice), by showing that (assuming the consistency of an [[inaccessible cardinal]]) there is a model of ZF, called [[Solovay's model]], in which [[countable choice]] holds, every set is Lebesgue measurable and in which the full axiom of choice fails.{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} The axiom of choice is equivalent to a fundamental result of [[point-set topology]], [[Tychonoff's theorem]], and also to the conjunction of two fundamental results of functional analysis, the [[Banach–Alaoglu theorem]] and the [[Krein–Milman theorem]].{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} It also affects the study of infinite groups to a large extent, as well as [[ring theory|ring]] and [[order theory]] (see [[Boolean prime ideal theorem]]).{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} However, the axioms of [[determinacy]] and [[dependent choice]] together are sufficient for most [[geometric measure theory]], [[potential theory]], [[Fourier series]] and [[Fourier transforms]], while making all subsets of the real line Lebesgue-measurable.{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)