Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Normativity
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Politics === {{See also|Political philosophy}} The use of normativity and normative theory in the study of politics has been questioned, particularly since the rise in popularity of [[logical positivism]]. It has been suggested by some that normative theory is not appropriate to be used in the study of politics, because of its [[Value judgment|value based]] nature, and a positive, value neutral approach should be taken instead, applying theory to what is, not to what ought to be.<ref name="Normative Political Theory">{{cite journal |last1=Pietrzyk-Reeves |first1=Dorota |title=Normative Political Theory |journal=Teoria Polityki |date=2017 |volume=1 |doi=10.4467/00000000tp.17.009.6588 |s2cid=150007680 |doi-access=free }}</ref> Others have argued, however, that to abandon the use of normative theory in politics is misguided, if not pointless, as not only is normative theory more than a projection of a theorist's views and values, but also this theory provides important contributions to political debate.<ref name="Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective">{{cite book |last1=Della Porta |first1=D |last2=Keating |first2=M |title=Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective |date=2008 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=304674&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live |access-date=1 December 2022}}</ref> Pietrzyk-Reeves discussed the idea that political science can never truly be value free, and so to not use normative theory is not entirely helpful. Furthermore, perhaps the normative dimension political study has is what separates it from many branches of social sciences.<ref name="Normative Political Theory"/> ==== International relations ==== In the academic discipline of [[International relations]], Smith, Baylis & Owens in the ''Introduction'' to their 2008 <ref>''The Globalization of World Politics: An introduction to international relations'', New York, Oxford University Press {{ISBN|9780199297771}}, Fourth edition, pp.2-13</ref> book make the case that the normative position or normative theory is to make the world a better place and that this theoretical [[worldview]] aims to do so by being aware of [[Tacit assumption|implicit assumption]]s and [[explicit assumption]]s that constitute a non-normative position, and align or position the normative towards the [[:wikt:loci|loci]] of other key socio-political theories such as political [[liberalism]], [[Marxism]], political [[Constructivism (international relations)|constructivism]], political [[Realism (international relations)|realism]], political [[idealism]] and [[political globalization]].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)