Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Optical mark recognition
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Reading=== The first optical answer sheets were read by shining a light through the sheet and measuring how much of the light was blocked using [[phototubes]] on the opposite side.<ref name=HowEverythingWorks.org>{{cite web|last=Bloomfield|first=Louis A|title=Question 1529: Why do scantron-type tests only read #2 pencils? Can other pencils work?|date=29 May 2006 |url=http://howeverythingworks.org/wordpress/2006/05/29/question-1529|publisher=HowEverythingWorks.org}}</ref> As some phototubes are mostly sensitive to the blue end of the [[visible spectrum]],<ref>Mullard Technical Handbook Volume 4 Section 4:Photoemissive Cells (1960 Edition)</ref> blue pens could not be used, as blue inks reflect and [[Transmittance|transmit]] blue light. Because of this, number two pencils had to be used to fill in the bubbles—[[graphite]] is a very [[Opacity (optics)|opaque]] substance which absorbs or reflects most of the light which hits it.<ref name=HowEverythingWorks.org /> Modern optical answer sheets are read based on reflected light, measuring lightness and darkness. They do not need to be filled in with a number two pencil, though these are recommended over other types (this is due to the lighter marks made by higher-number pencils and the smudges from number 1 pencils). Black ink will be read, though many systems will ignore marks that are the same color the form is printed in.<ref name=HowEverythingWorks.org /> This also allows optical answer sheets to be double-sided because marks made on the opposite side will not interfere with reflectance readings as much as with opacity readings. Most systems accommodate for [[human error]] in filling in ovals imprecisely—as long as they do not stray into the other ovals and the oval is almost filled, the scanner will detect it as filled in.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)