Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Philosophical methodology
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Methodological skepticism === [[Methodological skepticism]], also referred to as Cartesian doubt, uses systematic doubt as a method of philosophy.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Malachowski |first1=Alan |title=Methodological scepticism, metaphysics and meaning |journal=International Journal of Philosophical Studies |date=1 September 1993 |volume=1 |issue=2 |pages=302β312 |doi=10.1080/09672559308570774 |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09672559308570774 |issn=0967-2559}}</ref> It is motivated by the search for an absolutely [[certain]] foundation of knowledge. The method for finding these foundations is doubt: only that which is indubitable can serve this role.<ref name="VeryShortIntro">{{cite book |last1=Williamson |first1=Timothy |title=1. Introduction |date=2020 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-184724-0 |url=https://www.veryshortintroductions.com/view/10.1093/actrade/9780198810001.001.0001/actrade-9780198810001-chapter-1}}</ref><ref name="MeinerMethode"/> While this approach has been influential, it has also received various criticisms. One problem is that it has proven very difficult to find such absolutely certain claims if the doubt is applied in its most radical form.<ref name="VeryShortIntro"/> Another is that while absolute certainty may be desirable, it is by no means necessary for knowledge. In this sense, it excludes too much and seems to be unwarranted and arbitrary, since it is not clear why very certain theorems justified by strong arguments should be abandoned just because they are not absolutely certain. This can be seen in relation to the insights discovered by the empirical sciences, which have proven very useful even though they are not indubitable.<ref name="DalyHandbook"/>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)