Editing Pirate Act (section)

==Reaction==

'''Pro'''

*Groups within the entertainment industry, including the RIAA and the [[Motion Picture Association of America]] (MPAA) were very supportive of the Pirate Act. Jack Valenti, the MPAA's chief executive at the time, commended Senators Hatch and Leahy for "their vision and leadership in combating the theft of America's creative works." Additionally, Mitch Bainwol, then-chairman and CEO of the RIAA, agreed with Valenti's sentiments, stating that "this legislation provide[d] federal prosecutors with the flexibility and discretion to bring copyright-infringement cases that best correspond to the nature of the crime."<ref>{{cite magazine|last=Jardin|title=Congress Moves to Criminalize P2P.|url=https://www.wired.com/entertainment/music/news/2004/03/62830 | magazine=Wired|date=March 26, 2004}}</ref>

'''Con'''

*Some organizations feel that the passage of bills such as the Pirate Act would give private industry groups (such as the RIAA) unnecessary aid from the government. By using the financial advantages provided by the DOJ, the Act would put the responsibility of funding the war on intellectual property piracy on taxpayers, rather than the content owners. Those who oppose this legislation feel that it expands the role of government far beyond what is necessary in order to combat the issue. Stacie Rumenap, deputy director of the [[American Conservative Union]], was strongly against the bill: "The Pirate Act is another masquerade by Hollywood to make taxpayers foot the bill for its misguided war on promising new technology. Right now, Hollywood is trying to ram this flawed bill - a handout for Tinsel Town fat cats - through Congress without hearings or debate."<ref>{{cite web|last=Mark|first=Roy|title=Conservatives Aim to Sink Pirate Act|url=http://www.esecurityplanet.com/trends/article.php/3435421/Conservatives-Aim-to-Sink-Pirate-Act.htm|publisher=eSecurityPlanet.com|date=November 12, 2004}}</ref>
*Organizations such as P2P United, a group that represents software companies that run file-sharing networks, are opposed to the new laws that would punish file sharers. Instead, they propose that politicians should explore ways in which copyright holders can be paid through the movement of their works through P2P networks.<ref>{{cite magazine|last=Jardin|title=Congress Moves to Criminalize P2P|url=https://www.wired.com/entertainment/music/news/2004/03/62830 | magazine=Wired|date=March 26, 2004}}</ref>
*During the first quarter of 2004, Senator Leahy received $178,000 in campaign contributions from groups within the entertainment industries, which constituted his second-largest source of donations. Senator Hatch received $152,360 from similar groups.<ref>{{cite magazine|last=Jardin|title=Congress Moves to Criminalize P2P|url=https://www.wired.com/entertainment/music/news/2004/03/62830 | magazine=Wired|date=March 26, 2004}}</ref>