Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Pisot–Vijayaraghavan number
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Diophantine properties=== The main interest in PV numbers is due to the fact that their powers have a very "biased" distribution (mod 1). If ''α'' is a PV number and ''λ'' is any algebraic integer in the [[field (mathematics)|field]] <math>\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)</math> then the sequence : <math>\|\lambda\alpha^n\|,</math> where ||''x''|| denotes the distance from the real number ''x'' to the nearest integer, approaches 0 at an exponential rate. In particular, it is a square-summable sequence and its terms converge to 0. Two converse statements are known: they characterize PV numbers among all real numbers and among the algebraic numbers (but under a weaker Diophantine assumption). * Suppose ''α'' is a real number greater than 1 and ''λ'' is a non-zero real number such that :: <math> \sum_{n=1}^\infty \|\lambda\alpha^n\|^2 < \infty. </math> :Then ''α'' is a Pisot number and ''λ'' is an algebraic number in the field <math>\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)</math> ('''Pisot's theorem'''). * Suppose ''α'' is an algebraic number greater than 1 and ''λ'' is a non-zero real number such that :: <math> \|\lambda\alpha^n\| \to 0, \quad n\to\infty. </math> :Then ''α'' is a Pisot number and ''λ'' is an algebraic number in the field <math>\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)</math>. A longstanding '''Pisot–Vijayaraghavan problem''' asks whether the assumption that ''α'' is algebraic can be dropped from the last statement. If the answer is affirmative, Pisot's numbers would be characterized ''among all real numbers'' by the simple convergence of ||''λα''<sup>''n''</sup>|| to 0 for some auxiliary real ''λ''. It is known that there are only [[countable set|countably many]] numbers ''α'' with this property.<ref>{{cite arXiv |eprint=1401.7588 |last1=Schleischitz |first1=Johannes |title=On the rate of accumulation of $αζ^{n}$ mod 1 to 0 |date=2014 |class=math.NT }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Bertin |first1=M. J. |last2=Decomps-Guilloux |first2=A. |last3=Grandet-Hugot |first3=M. |last4=Pathiaux-Delefosse |first4=M. |last5=Schreiber |first5=J. P. |date=1992 |title=Pisot and Salem Numbers |url=https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-0348-8632-1 |journal=SpringerLink |language=en |pages=95 |doi=10.1007/978-3-0348-8632-1|isbn=978-3-0348-9706-8 }}</ref> The problem is to decide whether any of them is [[transcendental number|transcendental]].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)