Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Post-it note
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Competing claims=== [[Alan Amron]] claimed to have been the actual inventor in 1973 who disclosed the Post-it note technology to 3M in 1974.<ref name="LAT-Sticky">{{cite web|url=https://www.latimes.com/nation/ct-post-it-note-inventor-lawsuit-20160311-story.html|title=Sticky lawsuit: $400M dispute lingers over Post-it inventor|work=[[Los Angeles Times]]|date=March 12, 2016|access-date=March 13, 2017|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170314063535/http://www.latimes.com/nation/ct-post-it-note-inventor-lawsuit-20160311-story.html|archive-date=March 14, 2017}}</ref><ref name="Frean">{{cite web|url=http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/business/industries/consumer/article4717729.ece|title=Sticky situation as inventor sues 3M for $400m over Post-it Notes|last=Frean|first=Alexandra|date=March 21, 2016|work=[[The Times]]|access-date=March 13, 2017|url-status=dead|archive-date=2016-05-09 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160509102359/http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/business/industries/consumer/article4717729.ece}}</ref> His 1997 suit against 3M resulted in a confidential settlement.<ref name="LAT-Sticky" /> As part of the settlement, Amron agreed not to make future claims against the company unless the settlement agreement should be breached.<ref name="LAT-Sticky" /> However, in 2016, he launched a further suit against 3M,<ref name="LAT-Sticky" /><ref name="Frean" /> asserting that 3M was wrongly claiming to be the inventor, and seeking $400 million in damages.<ref>''Alan Amron v. 3M Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. et al.'', case number 9:16-cv-80125, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.</ref> At a preliminary hearing, a [[federal judge]] ordered the parties to undergo [[mediation]].<ref name="LAT-Sticky" /> The suit was subsequently dismissed, upholding the previous 1998 settlement.<ref name="Kang">{{cite web|url=https://www.law360.com/articles/838227/fla-man-s-400m-suit-over-invention-of-post-it-notes-tossed|title=Fla. Man's $400M Suit Over Invention Of Post-It Notes Tossed|last=Kang|first=Y. Peter|date=September 9, 2016|work=[[Law360]]|access-date=March 13, 2017|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170314064026/https://www.law360.com/articles/838227/fla-man-s-400m-suit-over-invention-of-post-it-notes-tossed|archive-date=March 14, 2017}}</ref> In 1997, 3M sued [[Microsoft]] for [[trademark]] infringement for creating an electronic Post-it in Microsoft's Office 97 and using the term βPost-itβ in a help file.<ref>{{Cite web |title=3M Sues Microsoft Over Post-It Note Trademark {{!}} The Seattle Times |url=https://archive.seattletimes.com/archive/?date=19970108&slug=2517732 |access-date=2023-11-10 |website=archive.seattletimes.com}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)