Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Puddleglum
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Christian elements== Lewis, himself an expert on allegory, did not consider ''The Chronicles of Narnia'' allegory. He saw them as "suppositional" answering the question, "What might [[Christ]] become like, if there really were a world like Narnia and He chose to be incarnate and die and rise again in that world as He actually has done in ours?' This is not allegory at all."<ref>{{Harvard citation|Martindale|Root|1990|pp=}}</ref> While not allegorical, Narnia does present significant parallels with elements from [[Christianity]]. Lewis is perhaps using Puddleglum to give a somewhat [[Existentialism|existential]] statement of faith when he writes, "Suppose we ''have'' only dreamed, or made up, all of those things—trees and grass and sun and moon and stars and [[Aslan]] himself. Suppose we have. Then all I can say is that, in that case, the made-up things seem a good deal more important than the real ones... We're just babies making up a game, if you're right. But four babies playing a game can make a play-world which licks your real world hollow. That's why I'm going to stand by the play-world. I'm on Aslan's side even if there isn't any Aslan to lead it. I'm going to live as like a Narnian as I can even if there isn't any Narnia... and that's a small loss if the world's as dull as you say."<ref>{{Harvard citation|Caughey|2005|pp=47}}</ref> Lewis himself said of this passage: :I suppose your philosopher son... means the chapter in which Puddleglum puts out the fire with his foot. He must thank [[Anselm of Canterbury|Anselm]] and [[René Descartes|Descartes]] for it, not me. I have simply put the '[[Ontological argument|Ontological Proof]]' in a form suitable for children. And even that is not so remarkable a feat as you might think. You can get into children's heads a good deal which is quite beyond the [[John Robinson (bishop of Woolwich)|Bishop of Woolwich]].<ref>Letter to Nancy Warner, 26 October 1963, in {{cite book|last=Hooper|first=Walter|title=The Collected Letters of C. S. Lewis, Volume III|year=2007|publisher=HarperCollins|isbn=978-0-06-081922-4|page=1472}}</ref> Lewis has, in sending the protagonists underground to a world which claims to be the only true one, also presented children with an inversion of [[Plato]]'s [[allegory of the cave]]. Puddleglum, with Plato, recognizes the difference between the world of shadows, and the world with the sun.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Johnson |first1=William C. |last2=Houtman |first2=Marcia K. |title=Platonic Shadows in C. S. Lewis' Narnia Chronicles |journal=Modern Fiction Studies |date=1986 |volume=32 |issue=1 |pages=75–87 |url=http://muse.jhu.edu/article/244283 |access-date=1 October 2018 |doi=10.1353/mfs.0.1154|s2cid=162284034 |url-access=subscription }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)