Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Qetesh
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Origin == Early researchers attempted to prove Qetesh was simply a form of a known Canaanite deity, rather than a fully independent goddess. [[William F. Albright]] proposed in 1939 that she was a form of the "lady of Byblos" ([[Baalat Gebal]]), while RenΓ© Dussard suggested a connection to "Asherat" (e.g. the biblical [[Asherah]]) in 1941. Subsequent studies tried to find further evidence for equivalence of Qetesh and Asherah, despite dissimilar functions and symbols.<ref>S. A. Wiggins, ''[https://www.academia.edu/1307032/The_Myth_of_Asherah_Lion_Lady_and_Serpent_Goddess The Myth of Asherah: Lion Lady and Serpent Goddess]'', ''Ugarit-Forschungen'' 23, 1991, p. 384-386; 389</ref> The arguments presenting Qetesh and Asherah as the same goddess rely on the erroneous notion that Asherah, [[Astarte]] and [[Anat]] were the only three prominent goddesses in the religion of ancient [[Levant]], and formed a trinity.<ref>S. A. Wiggins, ''[https://www.academia.edu/1307032/The_Myth_of_Asherah_Lion_Lady_and_Serpent_Goddess The Myth of Asherah: Lion Lady and Serpent Goddess]'', ''Ugarit-Forschungen'' 23, 1991, p. 387</ref> However, while Ashtart (Astarte) and Anat were closely associated with each other in [[Ugarit]], in Egyptian sources, and elsewhere,<ref>M. Smith, ''[https://www.academia.edu/12709064/_Athtart_in_Late_Bronze_Age_Syrian_Texts 'Athtart in Late Bronze Age Syrian Texts]'' [in:] D. T. Sugimoto (ed), ''Transformation of a Goddess. Ishtar β Astarte β Aphrodite'', 2014, p. 49-51</ref><ref>G. Del Olme Lete, ''[https://www.academia.edu/4583174/2013_KTU_1_107_A_miscellany_of_incantations_against_snakebite KTU 1.107: A miscellany of incantations against snakebite]'' [in] O. Loretz, S. Ribichini, W. G. E. Watson, J. Γ. Zamora (eds), ''Ritual, Religion and Reason. Studies in the Ancient World in Honour of Paolo Xella'', 2013, p. 198</ref> there is no evidence for conflation of Athirat and Ashtart, nor is Athirat associated closely with Ashtart and Anat in Ugaritic texts.<ref>S. A. Wiggins, ''[https://www.academia.edu/1307031/A_Reassessment_of_Asherah_With_Further_Considerations_of_the_Goddess A Reassessment of Asherah: With Further Considerations of the Goddess]'', 2007, p. 57, footnote 124; see also p. 169</ref> The concept of Athirat, Anat and Ashtart as a trinity and the only prominent goddesses in the entire region (popularized by authors like [[Tikva Frymer-Kensky]]) is modern and ignores the large role of other female deities, for example [[Shapash]], in known texts, as well as the fact El appears to be the deity most closely linked to Athirat in primary sources.<ref>S. A. Wiggins, ''[https://www.academia.edu/17830631/A_Reassessment_of_Tikva_Frymer_Kenskys_Asherah A Reassessment of Tikva Frymer-Kensky's Asherah]'' [in:] R. H. Bael, S. Halloway, J. Scurlock, ''In the Wake of Tikva Frymer-Kensky'', 2009, p. 174</ref><ref>S. A. Wiggins, ''[https://www.academia.edu/1307034/Shapsh_Lamp_of_the_Gods Shapsh, Lamp of the Gods]'' [in:] N. Wyatt (ed.), ''Ugarit, religion and culture: proceedings of the International Colloquium on Ugarit, Religion and Culture, Edinburgh, July 1994; essays presented in honour of Professor John C. L. Gibson'', 1999, p. 327</ref> One of the authors relying on the Anat-Ashtart-Athirat trinity theory is Saul M. Olyan (author of ''Asherah and the Cult of Yahweh in Israel'') who calls the Qudshu-Astarte-Anat plaque "a triple-fusion hypostasis", and considers Qudshu to be an epithet of Athirat by a process of elimination, for Astarte and Anat appear after Qudshu in the inscription.<ref>''The Ugaritic Baal cycle: Volume 2'' by Mark S. Smith, page 295</ref><ref>''The Origins of Biblical Monotheism: Israel's Polytheistic Background and the Ugaritic Texts'' by Mark S. Smith - Page 237</ref> Modern [[Egyptologists]], such as Christiane Zivie-Coche, do not consider Qetesh to be a hypostasis of Anat or Astarte, but a goddess developed in Egypt possibly without a clear forerunner among Canaanite or Syrian goddesses, though given a Semitic name and associated mostly with foreign deities.<ref>Ch. Zivie-Choche, ''[https://escholarship.org/content/qt7tr1814c/qt7tr1814c.pdf Foreign Deities in Egypt]'' [in:] J. Dieleman, W. Wendrich (eds.), ''UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology'', 2011, p. 5-6</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)