Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Quackery
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Criticism of quackery in academia == The [[evidence-based medicine]] community has criticized the infiltration of [[alternative medicine]] into mainstream academic medicine, education, and publications, accusing institutions of "diverting research time, money, and other resources from more fruitful lines of investigation in order to pursue a theory that has no basis in biology."<ref name="Gorski2010">{{cite web|last=Gorski|first=David|date=3 August 2010|title=Credulity about acupuncture infiltrates the ''New England Journal of Medicine''{{thinsp}}|website=sciencebasedmedicine.org|publisher=Science-Based Medicine|url=http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=6381|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101210043145/http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=6381|archive-date=10 December 2010|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Novella |first=Steven|author-link=Steven Novella|date=4 August 2010|title=Acupuncture pseudoscience in the ''New England Journal of Medicine''{{thinsp}}|website=sciencebasedmedicine.org|publisher=Science-Based Medicine|url=http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=6391|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100807053720/http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=6391|archive-date=7 August 2010|url-status=live}}</ref> For example, [[David Gorski]] criticized [[Brian M. Berman]], founder of the University of Maryland Center for Integrative Medicine, for writing that "There [is] evidence that both real acupuncture and sham acupuncture [are] more effective than no treatment and that acupuncture can be a useful supplement to other forms of conventional therapy for low back pain." He also castigated editors and peer reviewers at the ''[[New England Journal of Medicine]]'' for allowing it to be published, since it effectively recommended deliberately misleading patients in order to achieve a known [[placebo effect]].<ref name="Gorski2010" /><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Berman|first1=Brian M.|last2=Langevin|first2=Helene M.|author-link2=Helene Langevin|last3=Witt|first3=Claudia M.|last4=Dubner|first4=Ronald|date=29 July 2010|title=Acupuncture for chronic low back pain|journal=New England Journal of Medicine|volume=363|issue=5|pages=454β461|doi=10.1056/NEJMct0806114|pmid=20818865|s2cid=10129706}} Correction of an author name in {{cite journal|date=26 August 2010|title=Acupuncture for chronic low back pain|journal=New England Journal of Medicine|volume=363|issue=9|page=893|doi=10.1056/NEJMx100048|doi-access=free}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)