Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Reading Capital
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Reception== Together with Althusser's ''[[For Marx]]'' (1965), ''Reading Capital'' drew Althusser to the attention of French intellectuals and attracted a significant international readership. The appearance of ''Reading Capital'' and ''For Marx'' in English translation influenced the development of Marxist thought in the Anglophone world throughout the 1970s.{{sfn|Levine|2017|page=27}} The Marxian economist [[Harry Cleaver]] wrote that Althusser and his co-authors provided one of the most politically influential of the philosophical reinterpretations of ''Das Kapital'' that were made by Marxists in the 1960s and 1970s. However, he considered their influence regrettable, writing that in ''For Marx'' and ''Reading Capital'', Althusser's aim was to revitalize dialectical materialism "as an ideology to mediate the widely discredited political practices of the [[French Communist Party]]." He accused Althusser of ignoring working class struggles in favor of an abstract "science of history", and noted that Althusser himself admitted that ''Reading Capital'' largely ignored the [[class struggle]].{{sfn|Cleaver|2000|pages=47, 49β51}} William S. Lewis described ''Reading Capital'' as the culmination of the rereading of Marx that Althusser began in 1953. He considered it a theoretically sophisticated text. However, he suggested that the difficulty of the work supported the charge that Althusser aspired to "Leninist vanguardism" and wanted "a small, theoretically sophisticated cadre" to "direct the revolution", and expressed agreement with the historian [[Eric Hobsbawm]]'s view that the book showed that Althusser was an "extremely selective reader of Marx."{{sfn|Lewis|2005|pages=158, 163, 189}} The economist [[Alain Lipietz]] further pointed out that, while ''Reading Capital'' helped to disengage French Marxism from an oversimplification, determinism and mechanism inherited from the Stalinist period,{{sfn|Lipietz|1993|pages=99β138}} it also obscured and censored the first chapter of ''Das Kapital'', in which Marx analyzed the relationship of commodity and money.{{sfn|Kremers|Izuta|2017|page=724}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)