Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Reinforcement
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==History== Laboratory research on reinforcement is usually dated from the work of [[Edward Thorndike]], known for his experiments with cats escaping from puzzle boxes.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Thorndike E | title = Some Experiments on Animal Intelligence | journal = Science | volume = 7 | issue = 181 | pages = 818–24 | date = June 1898 | pmid = 17769765 | doi = 10.1126/science.7.181.818 | url = https://zenodo.org/record/1448297 | bibcode = 1898Sci.....7..818T }}</ref> A number of others continued this research, notably B.F. Skinner, who published his seminal work on the topic in ''[[The Behavior of Organisms]]'', in 1938, and elaborated this research in many subsequent publications.<ref>Skinner, B. F. "[https://books.google.com/books?id=S9WNCwAAQBAJ&q=Reinforcement The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis]", 1938 New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts</ref> Notably Skinner argued that positive reinforcement is superior to punishment in shaping behavior.<ref name=Walden>{{cite book| vauthors = Skinner BF |title=Walden Two| url = https://archive.org/details/waldentwo1948skin | url-access = registration |year=1948|publisher=The Macmillan Company|location=Toronto}}</ref> Though punishment may seem just the opposite of reinforcement, Skinner claimed that they differ immensely, saying that positive reinforcement results in lasting [[Behavior modification|behavioral modification]] (long-term) whereas punishment changes behavior only temporarily (short-term) and has many detrimental side-effects. A great many researchers subsequently expanded our understanding of reinforcement and challenged some of Skinner's conclusions. For example, Azrin and Holz defined punishment as a “consequence of behavior that reduces the future probability of that behavior,”<ref name=Honig>{{cite book|last=Honig|first=Werner | name-list-style = vanc |title=Operant Behavior: Areas of Research and Application|year=1966|publisher=Meredith Publishing Company|location=New York|page=381|url=http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1966-35017-000}}</ref> and some studies have shown that positive reinforcement and punishment are equally effective in modifying behavior.{{citation needed|date=January 2024}} Research on the effects of positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement and punishment continue today as those concepts are fundamental to learning theory and apply to many practical applications of that theory.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)